Ok, I've fixed the matrix jobs for 0.98, 1.4, and trunk builds are fixed
and running against appropriate JDKs now.

The fix was to removed the "Slave" Configuration matrix item (that was
configured in the advanced options), and only have the JDK configuration
matrix items. I've set them up so the look like this now (image is from
trunk [1])

Jon.

[1] [image: Inline image 1]

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Looks like the matrix jobs -- trunk and 1.4 aren't actually running
> anything as well as the updated 0.98 jobs.   This may have something to do
> with the JDK labels that were also updated recently[1].  Maybe this is
> related to the "space in a matrix label name" problem that caused us to
> change 1.2, and 1.3 into separate jobs?  (we have one good run in our
> history of 0.98 using the now removed latest1.6, latest1.7 labels. [2]
>
> Jon
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/JDK+
> Installation+Matrix
> [2] https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-
> 0.98-matrix/369/
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15.11.16 5:05 , Ted Yu wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at a reportedly successful build:
>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.4/533/console
>>>
>>> I don't see the JDK 1.7 / 1.8 builds.
>>>
>>> The build only took 2 min 44 sec ?
>>>
>>
>> This is pretty much the same we are seeing with our jobs [1]. The UI
>> doesn't show any configured nodes/labels, which I guess is why nothing
>> runs. However it doesn't offer the option to assign nodes/labels neither.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/zteyrxolwl46jcfh
>>
>
>
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>
>



-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh

Reply via email to