I agree we should EOL 0.98. St.Ack On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please speak up if it is incorrect to interpret the lack of responses as > indicating consensus on declaring 0.98 EOL. > > I believe we should declare 0.98 EOL. > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Folks! > > > > Back in January our Andrew Purtell stepped down as the release > > manager for the 0.98 release line. > > > > On the resultant dev@hbase thread[1] folks seemed largely in favor of > > declaring end-of-maintenance for the 0.98 line. > > > > Now that it's been a couple of months, does anyone have concerns about > > pushing forward on that? > > > > Do folks who listen on user@hbase but not dev@hbase have any concerns? > > > > As with any end-of-maintenance branch, the PMC would consider on a > > case-by-case basis doing a future release of the branch should a > > critical security vulnerability show up. > > > > > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/DjCi > > > > -busbey > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond > Teller (via Peter Watts) >
