That might be something I missed during 1.3.1 release preparation - is the general policy that we only have latest point release replicated at mirrors? If so then yeah, let's remove 1.3.0 from there. Thank for looking at it Nick!
-Mikhail On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > While I'm in there, I'll drop 1.3.0 as well? Should be only one release per > branch, IIRC. > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 8:30 PM Mikhail Antonov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1, and also to EOM 0.98. > > > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Andrew Purtell < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > We also have decided 0.98 is EOM too, I believe. > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > > > I noticed we still have hbase-0.94.27 and hbase-1.0.3 syncing out on > > the > > > > mirrors [0]. Since both of these lines are formally EOM, I think it's > > > time > > > > to retire the bits as well. Of course, people can always grab them > from > > > the > > > > Apache Archives [1]. If there's no objections, I'll take rm them this > > > week. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > [0]: https://www-us.apache.org/dist/hbase/ > > > > [1]: https://archive.apache.org/dist/hbase/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Michael Antonov > > > -- Thanks, Michael Antonov
