On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Ashish Singhi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Its not an issue. The log warnings are coming by HBASE-9393 patch. If user > Hadoop version is not 2.6.4+ or 2.7.0+ then this warn message will be > logged, notifying user about a CLOSE_WAIT connection left behind. As this > log message is in common code flow of read, should we up the log level to > avoid too many same warnings ? > > The alpha has hadoop-2.7.1. Should we be getting the above logs in this case? (Correct me Umesh if you came up on a different hadoop -- I don't think you did). S > Regards, > Ashish > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Oh, maybe file issues for what you found boss? > > St.Ack > > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Umesh! > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Umesh Agashe <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> - Downloaded the src tarball. > > >> - Verified the checksums and signature. Looks good. > > >> - Built from source. openjdk version "1.8.0_102" > > >> - mvn apache-rat:check Passed > > >> > > >> - Download the bin tarball. > > >> - Verified the checksums and signature. Looks good. > > >> - Extracted it. Layout looks good. > > >> - Started a local instance. Ran the 'hbase shell' with some basic > > table > > >> commands. Looks good. > > >> - Ran ltt with 10 million rows and 2 columns/ row > > >> > > >> Note: > > >> - Did not run unit tests. There are a problems with the build. See: > > >> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-2.0/jdk=JDK%201.8%20(lat > > >> est),label=Hadoop/10/console > > >> - Noticed a few errors in the log file like: > > >> WARN [MemStoreFlusher.1] io.FSDataInputStreamWrapper: Failed to > invoke > > >> 'unbuffer' method in class class org.apache.hadoop.fs. > FSDataInputStream > > . > > >> So there may be a TCP socket connection left open in CLOSE_WAIT state. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > The minimum voting period is 72 hours for a PMC to bless a > release. > > >> > > Can we aim for that? > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Sure (Stickler!) > > >> > St.Ack > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-alpha-1 is up at: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-alp > > >> ha-1RC0/ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >> > orgapachehbase-1169 > > >> > > > > > >> > > > All was signed w/ my key 8ACC93D2 > > >> > > > <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-alpha-1RC0 > > >> > > > (c830a0f47f58d4892dd3300032c8244d6278aecc). > > >> > > > > > >> > > > hbase-2.0.0-alpha-1 will be our first 2.0.0 release. It is a > rough > > >> cut > > >> > > > ('alpha') not-for-production preview of what hbase-2.0.0 will > look > > >> > like. > > >> > > It > > >> > > > is what we used to call a 'Developer' release[1] meant mostly > for > > >> devs > > >> > > and > > >> > > > downstreamers to test drive and flag us early if we there are > > issues > > >> > > we’ve > > >> > > > missed ahead of our rolling a production-worthy release. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > hbase-2.0.0 includes a fleet of new features that include a new > > >> > > assignment > > >> > > > manager, means for keeping read and write path off-heap, > in-memory > > >> > > > compactions, and more. I have been keeping a running doc on the > > >> state > > >> > of > > >> > > > 2.0.0 here [2]. There is much to do still (see aforementioned > > doc). > > >> > > > > > >> > > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here > > >> [4]. > > >> > > There > > >> > > > are about 2500. The list of ~500 fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can > be > > >> > found > > >> > > > here [3]. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Please take it for a spin and vote on whether it ok to put out > as > > >> our > > >> > > first > > >> > > > alpha (bar is low for an 'alpha'). Let the VOTE be open for 24 > > >> hours. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > St.Ack > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning.pre10 > > >> > > > 2. > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_ > > >> > > ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#heading=h.v21r9nz8g01j > > >> > > > 3. > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17852?jql= > > >> > > project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202. > > >> > > 0.0%20and%20fixVersion%20not%20in%20(1.0.0%2C%201.0.1%2C% > > >> > > 201.0.2%2C%201.0.3%2C%201.0.4%2C%201.0.5%2C%201.0.6%2C%201. > > >> > > 1.0%2C%201.1.1%2C%201.1.2%2C%201.1.3%2C%201.1.4%2C%201.1.5% > > >> > > 2C%201.1.6%2C%201.1.7%2C%201.1.8%2C%201.1.9%2C%201.1.10%2C% > > >> > > 201.2.0%2C%201.2.1%2C%201.2.2%2C%201.2.3%2C%201.2.4%2C%201. > > >> > > 2.5%2C%201.2.6%2C%201.3.0%2C%201.3.1%2C%201.4.0)%20and%20% > > >> > > 20(status%20%3D%20Open%20or%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch% > > 20Available%22) > > >> > > > 4. > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18191?jql= > > >> > > project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20(%20fixVersion%20%3D% > > >> > > 202.0.0)%20and%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved) > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
