bq. I could try w/ a 3.0.x for future release if it a pain? Never mind boss, I just used 3.3.1 in my local env and found it requires newer version, so left a note for new voters to save some of their time (smile).
bq. No plans to up guava or protobuf versions on branch-1. You think we should? We met with guava conflict when using hbase in Flink, and I could see similar issue mentioned in spark. Since branch-1 is still the stable release line and will be in the near future, possible to do similar shading w/o upgrading the guava/protobuf version? Thanks. Best Regards, Yu On 3 July 2017 at 14:01, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > Then it will be a bit pain if developers want to see the source code of the > relocated classes in IDE? > > 2017-07-03 12:31 GMT+08:00 Stack <st...@duboce.net>: > > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 8:16 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: OK > > > 'mvn clean install': OK, the size of the generated jar files are > > reasonable > > > Unzip the generated jar files: OK, all classes are relocated under > > > org/apache/hadoop/hbase/shaded > > > > > > Only one minor question, seems we do not generate sources jars? There > is > > > a hbase-shaded-protobuf-1.0.0-sources.jar after 'mvn install' but the > > size > > > is only 22 bytes. > > > > > > > > Good question. This project is a little bit odd. It is just poms (and a > few > > patches). The poms do a download, relocation, and then push to deploy the > > jars to mvn repo. There is no real 'source' -- not anything that makes > > sense to stuff in a src.jar -- other than the poms that are here in the > > tgz (mvn install puts the jars w/ relocation into your local repo.... > add a > > 'deploy' to push to mvn repository -- see README). > > > > Thanks Duo, > > S > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > 2017-07-02 2:38 GMT+08:00 Stack <st...@duboce.net>: > > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting vote. The vote is on an RC made out of a new > > > hbase > > > > > project, hbase-thirdparty. > > > > > > > > > > First the usual stuff. > > > > > > > > > > The 1.0.0RC0 is available at: > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase- > > > thirdparty/1.0.0RC0/ > > > > > > > > > > Maven artifacts are in the following staging repository: > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > orgapachehbase-1171 > > > > > > > > > > Artifacts are signed with 8ACC93D2 which is at the tail of our KEYS > > > file > > > > > http://www-us.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS. > > > > > > > > > > I tagged this RC as 1.0.0RC at 8ffaf3dd561052bcc71772148ecd04 > > > cdf9e224f3 > > > > > in the new hbase-thirdparty repository at [1]. > > > > > > > > > > Now to the unusual. > > > > > > > > > > The artifact was made from a new repository, hbase-thirdparty[1]. > > > > > hbase-thirdparty is a project overseen by the hbase PMC. It came of > > > > > discussion on the dev list in the thread '[DISCUSS] More Shading' > > [2]. > > > > > Its charge is the hosting of ornery thirdparty libs -- e.g. > protobuf, > > > > > guava, netty -- that need patching and/or shading so we are no > longer > > > > bound > > > > > by whatever the version of a lib Hadoop happens to ship (and we can > > > > change > > > > > versions w/o damaging out glorious downstreamers). In the past, > when > > > > we've > > > > > been able, we've done this dirty patching and shading work as an > > > > > unacknowledged 'pre-build' hack step appended to our protobuf file > > > > > generation. Moving this mess out of our mainline build to live > > > elsewhere, > > > > > pulled in as a legit 'dependency', simplifies our build > particularly > > > > around > > > > > the shading of third-part libs; the narrower scope of a dedicated > > > project > > > > > that produces transformed jars is easier to reason about, is less > > > likely > > > > to > > > > > clash with existing dependencies whether transitive or otherwise, > and > > > it > > > > > makes for less spaghetti poms. > > > > > > > > > > Other (minor) benefits include our being able to generate protobuf > > > files > > > > > inline now; no need of the pre-build anymore nor checking in of > > > generated > > > > > protobuf files (25MB). There is a patch to remove them (predicated > > on > > > > this > > > > > hbase-thirdparty release): "HBASE-17056 Remove checked in PB > > generated > > > > > files". > > > > > > > > > > Downside is having to explicitly reference our version in code as > in > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.shaded.com.google.protobuf.Message rather > > than > > > > > just com.google.protobuf.Message and so on for guava references, > etc. > > > > > (We've been doing this for a while now so hopefully it not too > > strange > > > > > developing)*. > > > > > > > > > > There is little to this new project other than a few poms to do > > > packaging > > > > > and a couple of patches we apply on build. It works by pulling down > > > > > dependencies and doing whatever shading, renaming, or patching we > > need. > > > > > Currently hbase-thirdparty hosts protobuf (3.1.0 => 3.3.1), guava > > (12.0 > > > > => > > > > > 22.0), gson, protobuf-util, and netty 4.1.12-FINAL. It publishes > > three > > > > jars > > > > > for hbase to consume: hbase-shaded-protobuf, hbase-shaded-netty, > and > > > then > > > > > hbase-shaded-miscellaneous for the remaining libs. Philosophy is if > > the > > > > lib > > > > > is troublesome, protobuf needs patching and netty includes an .so > > that > > > > > needs a rename, then give it its own module (See README in the > > release > > > > for > > > > > more). I've arrived at this layout for hbase-thirdparty after a > bunch > > > of > > > > > experimentation and messing with hbase dependencies (See sub-tasks > > > under > > > > > HBASE-17898 Update dependencies). That said, as we head to > > hbase-2.0.0, > > > > we > > > > > might have to make a an odd new release of hbase-thirdparty but > > > > thereafter > > > > > I'd imagine it should settle down to be an infrequent update. > > > > > > > > > > VOTE lasts 72 hours. Let +1 be an assent to the hbase-thirdparty > > > project > > > > > and a vote for this RC. > > > > > > > > > > Questions on how it will go w/ this project welcome on this thread. > > If > > > > > heavy-detail on how the shading works, I suggest ask on the > > '[DISCUSS] > > > > More > > > > > Shading' thread. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > 1. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase-thirdparty > > > > > 2. See the '[DISCUSS] More Shading' thread, > > > > http://apache-hbase.679495.n3. > > > > > nabble.com/DISCUSS-More-Shading-td4083025.html > > > > > > > > > > * Doc on how to make use of hbase-thirdparty is coming for the > > > refguide. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
