Francis Liu has talked before about how useful this feature has been for them.
Unfortunately I won't be able to give you personal feedback until some time after it is out in the 1.4 code line. The way the schedule looks a 1.4.0 release will precede (and be a prerequisite for) enabling rsgroups in our production. On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > Sounds great to me. Would love to see more feedback on the utility of the > rsgroups feature. > > What ever happened to the issue that was keeping 1.3 from becoming the > stable release line? That still outstanding for 1.4 too? > > On Oct 4, 2017 16:24, "Andrew Purtell" <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I had hoped to make a release candidate of 1.4.0 a long time ago when I > > first made the branch, but work/life intervened. Sorry it has been slow > > going. > > > > I've been making some test fixes to shore up unit test suite results. > > > > As far as big items, at this point a candidate 1.4.0 is only waiting on > > HBASE-15631 (https://reviews.apache.org/r/60672/). I had to go away for > > work for a while but am now back pushing that forward. For me as > branch-1.4 > > RM regionserver assignment groups is the must have feature for the 1.4 > code > > line. If anyone has a strong feeling against this, let's discuss it now. > I > > have asked before and I believe there are no objections to doing the > > backport because the functional changes are entirely contained to the new > > hbase-rsgroups module. > > > > Once HBASE-15631 is resolved I will be able to make a RC. This should be > > soon. I've addressed all of the review feedback up on RB and anticipate > > only minor additional changes to fix any issues discovered during unit > and > > cluster testing. > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
