+1 for having the minimum (supported) hbase1 version be 1.2.x. On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> Over in the adjacent "[DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.0 compatibility expectations" > thread, we chatted some on what would be the minimum hbase-1.x version from > which you can upgrade to hbase-2. > > The last statement made on this topic by Sean was that only upgrades from > 1.2.x, our current stable offering, or later should be supported. > > There was no dissent. > > We all good w/ this? Speak up if you disagree else 1.2.x becomes the > 'official' minimum. > > NOTES: > > + We need to agree on a minimum so we know what migrations to test. > + It might be possible to upgrade from versions before 1.2.x but we (or at > least I -- smile) won't have tried it or run verifications to ensure all > made it over (let us know if you successfully migrate from a baseline that > precedes 1.2). > + Hopefully we can avoid requiring Users move to the latest on the 1.2 > branch. This shouldn't be necessary doing a stop/start upgrade. It might be > needed doing a rolling upgrade. Lets see. > > Thanks, > St.Ack >
