On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > Wanted to get some input on the versioning scheme for our hbase-thirdparty > artifacts. > > We are moving all of the relocation from o.a.h.shaded to o.a.h.thirdparty > due to conflicts with our non-thirdparty shaded libraries. Currently, the > next release is slated to be of the thirdparty libs is slated to be 1.0.2, > however the package change seems like a big deal. > > I propose that we go to 1.1.0 or 2.0.0 even with this. Version numbers are > cheap, we won't run out, so we can afford to be aggressive with > incrementing them. And we don't have to worry about other users of this, > since it's all designed to be internal. > > Thoughts? > > 2.0.0
Thanks Mike, S > Mike >
