I fixed HBASE-19429 by disabling checkstyle report generation during the site target. There's something wrong with it. Maybe too many warnings? I get an inscrutable error on MacOS and a segfault in the JVM on Linux.
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > I am blocked on HBASE-19429. If someone could help I could really use it. > I'm out of time today and won't make the self-imposed timeline for release > today. I'm out tomorrow. Earliest will be Wednesday but I have no idea how > to proceed with this build failure. > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We need to discuss branch-1 policy regarding builds against Hadoop 3.0.0. >> See HBASE-19421 >> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I propose to eject hbase-native-client to GitHub on HBASE-19419 >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> No problem, please commit it. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Guanghao Zhang <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Andrew, HBASE-18626 is a document fix for the incompatible change >>>>> about the >>>>> replication TableCFs' config. Can we include it for 1.4? Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> 2017-12-01 9:19 GMT+08:00 Stack <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> > I pushed HBASE-18233. Thanks for finding the issue and patience >>>>> waiting on >>>>> > fix Andrew. >>>>> > St.Ack >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>>>> > >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > No problem, committing it now >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Sergey Soldatov < >>>>> > [email protected] >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > Andrew, >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Can we include HBASE-19393 as well? Quite annoying issue and very >>>>> > simple >>>>> > > > fix. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Thanks, >>>>> > > > Sergey >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Purtell < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > > Not too late, no >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Stack <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > Fix is up if it is not too late Andrew. >>>>> > > > > > St.Ack >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Stack <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > Andrew, your testing has turned up an issue in >>>>> HBASE-18233. It is >>>>> > > > > present >>>>> > > > > > > in the 1.4 candidate patch and in 1.3. The failure is >>>>> > > intermittent. I >>>>> > > > > am >>>>> > > > > > > working on a fix but want to make sure I have it right. >>>>> So, I >>>>> > > > withdraw >>>>> > > > > my >>>>> > > > > > > request that 1.4 include it. >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > Thanks, >>>>> > > > > > > S >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Andrew Purtell < >>>>> > > [email protected] >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> TestGlobalThrottler is a problem stemming from the revert >>>>> of >>>>> > > > > HBASE-9465 >>>>> > > > > > >> on branch-1.4. The test came in on HBASE-17314 so I'll >>>>> also >>>>> > > revert >>>>> > > > > > that >>>>> > > > > > >> from branch-1.4. For more on this see HBASE-19381 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Purtell < >>>>> > > > [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> > The TestEndToEndSplitTransaction failure will be fixed >>>>> by >>>>> > > > > HBASE-19379. >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> > The TestGlobalThrottler issue is a hang, which is >>>>> probably why >>>>> > > it >>>>> > > > > > >> slipped >>>>> > > > > > >> > through the cracks. I went back 32 commits from head >>>>> and it >>>>> > was >>>>> > > > > still >>>>> > > > > > >> > stuck. 64 commits back it's good. Somewhere in between. >>>>> Will >>>>> > get >>>>> > > > to >>>>> > > > > > the >>>>> > > > > > >> > offending commit shortly. >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Purtell < >>>>> > > > > [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >> Thanks. I'll take a look. They were passing for me >>>>> before I >>>>> > > went >>>>> > > > > out >>>>> > > > > > on >>>>> > > > > > >> >> vacation. >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Stack < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> Thanks. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> BTW, I noticed this morning that TestGlobalThrottler >>>>> and >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> TestEndToEndSplitTransaction >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> fail locally for me and up on jenkins as part of >>>>> hadoopqa >>>>> > runs >>>>> > > > and >>>>> > > > > > on >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> recent 1.4 runs. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> I tried to poke at why. They seem fine in 1.2, 1.3, >>>>> and 2.0. >>>>> > > Got >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> distracted >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> and got no further than this.... >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> S >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Purtell < >>>>> > > > > > [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > Ok, no problem. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Stack < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > May I get HBASE-18233 into 1.4.0 Andrew? It is in >>>>> 1.2 >>>>> > and >>>>> > > > 1.3. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> Waiting on >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > hadoopqa run. Would be good to have it all up and >>>>> down >>>>> > > > > branch-1. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > Thanks Sir, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > St.Ack >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Peter Somogyi < >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > HBASE-19188 was just resolved. :) >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Andrew Purtell >>>>> < >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > I come back to find HBASE-19188 is a blocker. >>>>> :-/ >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Need to resolve it >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Sean Busbey >>>>> < >>>>> > > > > > >> [email protected] >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > thanks for all the work as RM on this >>>>> Andrew! >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Andrew >>>>> Purtell >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Everything is in and ready to go. I'm out >>>>> next >>>>> > > week >>>>> > > > > for >>>>> > > > > > >> the >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Thanksgiving >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > holiday, but will be back first week in >>>>> > December. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Here is what I anticipate: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 4 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - 1.4.0 RC0 binaries will be >>>>> available. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - Voting begins. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - Preflight checks will include RAT >>>>> check, >>>>> > > > > release >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> audits, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > and >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > 25 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > iterations of the unit test suite. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 5 - 8 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - 24 hours ITBLL >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - PE and YCSB on cluster perf >>>>> comparison >>>>> > > with >>>>> > > > > 1.2 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - PE and YCSB single server >>>>> profiling with >>>>> > > > JFR, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> comparison >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > with >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > 1.2 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 11 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - Voting concludes >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - Release, or RC1 depending on >>>>> testing >>>>> > > outcome >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - December 18 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - RC1 voting concludes and release, >>>>> if we >>>>> > > > need a >>>>> > > > > > RC1 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > From now until the 1.4.0 release, please >>>>> refrain >>>>> > > > from >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> committing >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > potentially destabilizing changes or >>>>> changes to >>>>> > > > public >>>>> > > > > > >> APIs >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> to >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > branch-1.4. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Andrew >>>>> > Purtell < >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> On HBASE-19232 we discuss testing the >>>>> shaded >>>>> > > client >>>>> > > > > > using >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> YCSB, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > so >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > I'll >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> use it to sanity check the shaded client >>>>> as >>>>> > well >>>>> > > as >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> complete a >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > perf >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> comparison with 1.2. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Andrew >>>>> > Purtell < >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> I'll do a PE comparison between 1.4.0 >>>>> and 1.3 >>>>> > > > and/or >>>>> > > > > > >> 1.2. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> Maybe >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > YSCB >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > too >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> if I have time. Good idea, thanks. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > On Nov 11, 2017, at 5:05 AM, Yu Li < >>>>> > > > > > [email protected]> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Great to know, really good progress! >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > It seems we don't do performance >>>>> comparison >>>>> > > with >>>>> > > > > > >> current >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > stable >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > release >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > when releasing the first RC of a new >>>>> branch, >>>>> > > but >>>>> > > > > > >> should >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> we do >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > to >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > avoid >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > issues like HBASE-14460 (write >>>>> performance >>>>> > > > > > regression >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> from >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > 0.98 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > to >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > 1.1)? >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > This is a must-have for us to decide >>>>> new >>>>> > > version >>>>> > > > > for >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> product >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > env >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > here, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> and >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > I wonder whether this applies for >>>>> most users >>>>> > > > > (please >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> forgive >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > my >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> ignorance >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > if there's any existing policy for >>>>> this). >>>>> > > > Thanks. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > bq. Back when we first discussed >>>>> branching >>>>> > for >>>>> > > > 1.4 >>>>> > > > > > Yu >>>>> > > > > > >> Li >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > asked >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > for >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> this... >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Thanks for remembering this and >>>>> keeping the >>>>> > > > > promise >>>>> > > > > > >> boss >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > (smile). >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Best Regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > Yu >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> On 11 November 2017 at 03:30, Andrew >>>>> > Purtell >>>>> > > < >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > [email protected] >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> wrote: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> The march to 1.4.0 is progressing. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> I've run the unit test suite on a C4 >>>>> class >>>>> > > AWS >>>>> > > > > > >> instance >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> 25 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > times >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > and >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> there >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> are no failures. This is ongoing. I'm >>>>> > aiming >>>>> > > > for >>>>> > > > > > 100 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> runs. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Fix versions are now set up for >>>>> > constructing >>>>> > > a >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> reasonable >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > change >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > log. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> With HBASE-19232 applied a build with >>>>> > release >>>>> > > > > > audits >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> enabled >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > will >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > pass. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> I backported error-prone support >>>>> yesterday >>>>> > > and >>>>> > > > > will >>>>> > > > > > >> now >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> look >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > at >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> checkstyle >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> and error-prone analyses for >>>>> important >>>>> > > issues. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> I'll probably do HBASE-19238 before >>>>> 1.4.0 >>>>> > > goes >>>>> > > > > out >>>>> > > > > > so >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> that >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > neat >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > utility >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> will be available. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Back when we first discussed >>>>> branching for >>>>> > > 1.4 >>>>> > > > Yu >>>>> > > > > > Li >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> asked >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > for >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > this: >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> One naive question here: from the >>>>> book >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> <http://hbase.apache.org/book. >>>>> > > > > > html#hbase.versioning >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> we >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > will >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > add >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> functionality (in a >>>>> backwards-compatible >>>>> > > > manner) >>>>> > > > > > in >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> minor >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > versions, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> but >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> it >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> seems we don't have any one-line >>>>> > description >>>>> > > > on >>>>> > > > > > the >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > differences >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > (what >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> main functionalities have been >>>>> added) >>>>> > > between >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > branch-1.1/1.2/1.3/1.4 >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> so >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> user could better decide which >>>>> version to >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> choose/upgrade. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > Should >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > we >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> add some explicit document on this? >>>>> Or >>>>> > > release >>>>> > > > > > note >>>>> > > > > > >> of >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> the >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > first >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> release >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>> for each branch is enough? Thanks. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> and I still agree to do it. I'll >>>>> write it >>>>> > up >>>>> > > > > while >>>>> > > > > > >> the >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> RC is >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > under >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> evaluation. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> ITBLL and replication testing to be >>>>> > performed >>>>> > > > on >>>>> > > > > a >>>>> > > > > > >> small >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > cluster >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > once >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> we >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> have the RC binaries. >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Anything else? (Within reason...) >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> -- >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> Words like orphans lost among the >>>>> > crosstalk, >>>>> > > > > > meaning >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> torn >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > from >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> -- >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> Words like orphans lost among the >>>>> crosstalk, >>>>> > > > meaning >>>>> > > > > > torn >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> from >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > -- >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the >>>>> crosstalk, >>>>> > > meaning >>>>> > > > > > torn >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> from >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > -- >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, >>>>> meaning >>>>> > > > torn >>>>> > > > > > from >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > -- >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, >>>>> meaning torn >>>>> > > from >>>>> > > > > > >> truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>> >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >> -- >>>>> > > > > > >> >> Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> >> Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning >>>>> torn >>>>> > from >>>>> > > > > > truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> >> decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> >> - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> > -- >>>>> > > > > > >> > Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> > Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning >>>>> torn from >>>>> > > > > truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> > decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> > - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> -- >>>>> > > > > > >> Best regards, >>>>> > > > > > >> Andrew >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn >>>>> from >>>>> > > > truth's >>>>> > > > > > >> decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > > >> - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > > >> >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > -- >>>>> > > > > Best regards, >>>>> > > > > Andrew >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from >>>>> > truth's >>>>> > > > > decrepit hands >>>>> > > > > - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -- >>>>> > > Best regards, >>>>> > > Andrew >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from >>>>> truth's >>>>> > > decrepit hands >>>>> > > - A23, Crosstalk >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Andrew >>>> >>>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >>>> decrepit hands >>>> - A23, Crosstalk >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Andrew >>> >>> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >>> decrepit hands >>> - A23, Crosstalk >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Andrew >> >> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's >> decrepit hands >> - A23, Crosstalk >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
