This VOTE has passed, with 3x binding +1's, a non-binding +1, and a non-binding -0. Thank you to everyone who voted on this release, and who has participated over the last 18-ish months on making branch-1.1 a successful, viable release line.
I'll go about the finishing touches. Thanks, Nick On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: > Let's call it a -0. :) > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Yea, this candidate is fine to promote from my perspective and given > the > > > other votes cast. Thanks for putting this together, Nick! > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > In that case, would you mind formally upgrading your vote from a -1? I'd > > like to remove any ambiguity that may remain. With that done, I can call > > the VOTE. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > At close of the period, this VOTE has received 3x binding +1's, a > > > > non-binding +1, and a non-binding -1, with no other votes cast. > > > > > > > > My understanding is that the issues raised by the non-binding -1 are > to > > > be > > > > taken as guidance for subsequent release lines and do not impact the > > > > standing of this candidate. > > > > > > > > Mike, is that view consistent with your intentions? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > - verified tarballs vs public key on people.apache.org. > > > > > - extracted bin tgz: > > > > > - inspect structure. look good. > > > > > - with jdk1.8.0_65: > > > > > - run LoadTestTool against standalone bin tgz with FAST_DIFF > > block > > > > > encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good. > > > > > - poked around webUI. looks good. > > > > > - load the site, browsed book. > > > > > - extracted src tgz: > > > > > - inspect structure. look good. > > > > > - run LoadTestTool against standalone built from src tgz with > > > FAST_DIFF > > > > > block encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good. > > > > > - poked around webUI. looks good. > > > > > - ran the hbase-downstreamer project vs. the staged maven > repository. > > > > > tests pass. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> +1 > > > > >> > > > > >> Checked sums and signatures: ok > > > > >> Ran unit tests: passed > > > > >> Started standalone cluster and did some basic operations > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > +1 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Checked sums and signatures: ok > > > > >> > Checked compat report: ok > > > > >> > RAT check passed: ok (7u80) > > > > >> > Built from source: ok (7u80) > > > > >> > Unit tests pass: ok (8u131) > > > > >> > 1M row LTT: ok (8u131) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Nick Dimiduk < > ndimi...@apache.org > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > No one has voted a binding -1 with actionable changes, so as > far > > > as > > > > >> I'm > > > > >> > > concerned this RC remains valid. If people need more time, we > > can > > > > >> extend > > > > >> > > this vote. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > > >> > > Nick > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Nick: > > > > >> > > > Originally you set tomorrow as deadline. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Is there a new RC coming out (w.r.t. Mike's comment) ? > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > Cheers > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Nick Dimiduk < > > > ndimi...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Mike: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Do you plan to make a human-readable set of release > notes > > in > > > > >> > addition > > > > >> > > > to > > > > >> > > > > the list of JIRA issues resolved? > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Not as such. For all branch-1.1 releases, I've written up > a > > > > little > > > > >> > > > > human-friendly summary in the ANNOUNCE email. Basically, > > > > >> expanding on > > > > >> > > the > > > > >> > > > > list of JIRA tickets I highlight in the RC notes to > include > > > > their > > > > >> > full > > > > >> > > > > ticket summaries. I haven't followed the details of the > > > > branch-1.4 > > > > >> > > > release > > > > >> > > > > line, so I'm not sure what additional information you > might > > be > > > > >> hoping > > > > >> > > > for. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > tar missing hbase-native-client (present in tag) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > That's been the case since rel/1.1.0. We as a community > > have > > > > >> never > > > > >> > > > shipped > > > > >> > > > > a binary native client in this release line and we've > never > > > > >> claimed > > > > >> > > that > > > > >> > > > > the native sources packaged herein are ready for > production > > > > >> > > consumption. > > > > >> > > > > They probably should have been dropped from the branch > > before > > > > >> initial > > > > >> > > > > release, but that was not done. I have no objection to > > > dropping > > > > >> them > > > > >> > > > from a > > > > >> > > > > branch-1.1 release; from the git log, I see no commit > > activity > > > > to > > > > >> > that > > > > >> > > > > module since Jan 2014. I don't see any of this as a > blocker > > > for > > > > >> this > > > > >> > > RC. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > WARNING! HBase file layout needs to be upgraded ... > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > When I test these RC's on a Mac, I explicitly set > > > hbase.tmp.dir > > > > >> to a > > > > >> > > > > location specific to the candidate I've unpacked. This has > > the > > > > >> > benefit > > > > >> > > > > avoiding cross-version conflicts and other weirdness of > Mac > > > tmp > > > > >> > > directory > > > > >> > > > > management. For instance, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > <configuration> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > <property><name>hbase.tmp.dir< > /name><value>/tmp/hbase-1.1. > > > > >> > > > > 13/tmp</value></property> > > > > >> > > > > </configuration> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Peter: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > In the logs I saw this line. Source code repository URL > > > looks > > > > >> > > > incorrect. > > > > >> > > > > > 2017-12-04 10:13:27,028 INFO [main] util.VersionInfo: > > > Source > > > > >> code > > > > >> > > > > repository *git://diocles.local/Volumes/ > hbase-1.1.13/hbase* > > > > >> > > > > revision=c64bf8a9f35352cd504f2b8f4b02f9148cf45ab6 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Looking through the log, HBASE-16538 / > > > > >> > > > > 851c89af6ef9a78e2e3bc9ad3153367e85731c81 looks > suspicious. > > It > > > > >> looks > > > > >> > > like > > > > >> > > > > that change first shipped in 1.1.7. Indeed, I see the > > > equivelant > > > > >> line > > > > >> > > in > > > > >> > > > > the binary release of 1.1.12. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > > > >> > apurt...@apache.org > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I think this can be fixed by using `git archive` to > > > > generate > > > > >> > the > > > > >> > > > src > > > > >> > > > > > tar > > > > >> > > > > > > instead of the src assembly. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We could update the make_rc.sh script to create the > > source > > > > >> > tarball > > > > >> > > in > > > > >> > > > > > this > > > > >> > > > > > > way. Would you be willing to make a patch for that? > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > (I think you fellows already figured this going by JIRA > > > > >> > movement....) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > HBASE-19152 "Update refguide 'how to build an RC' and > the > > > > >> > make_rc.sh > > > > >> > > > > > script" changed make_rc.sh to use git archive. Wasn't > > > > backported > > > > >> > > > though. > > > > >> > > > > > S > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > For release 1.4.0 and up though I propose we remove > > > > >> > > > hbase-native-client > > > > >> > > > > > as > > > > >> > > > > > > unmaintained. It can be resurrected as an independent > > > > project > > > > >> on > > > > >> > > > GitHub > > > > >> > > > > > if > > > > >> > > > > > > any interested parties show up. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Mike Drob < > > > > md...@apache.org> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I think I used some shorthand earlier and > ambiguously > > > > >> > represented > > > > >> > > > my > > > > >> > > > > > > > problem. The issue is that native is missing from > the > > > > >> _source_ > > > > >> > > > > > tarball. I > > > > >> > > > > > > > completely understand why it would be missing from > the > > > > >> binary > > > > >> > > > > tarball, > > > > >> > > > > > > > maintaining native binaries is a huge hassle and not > > in > > > > our > > > > >> > > scope, > > > > >> > > > > IMO. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > However, I think it is fair for users to expect that > > > they > > > > >> can > > > > >> > > > > download > > > > >> > > > > > > our > > > > >> > > > > > > > source release, and build a native client from > there. > > Or > > > > at > > > > >> > least > > > > >> > > > it > > > > >> > > > > > will > > > > >> > > > > > > > have native code. They shouldn't need to go to git > to > > > the > > > > >> the > > > > >> > > > native > > > > >> > > > > > > source > > > > >> > > > > > > > code. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I think this can be fixed by using `git archive` to > > > > generate > > > > >> > the > > > > >> > > > src > > > > >> > > > > > tar > > > > >> > > > > > > > instead of the src assembly. The other option is to > > > > remove > > > > >> the > > > > >> > > > > > > > hbase-native-client directory from branch-1.1 and > then > > > > >> there's > > > > >> > no > > > > >> > > > > > > > divergence between src tar and src tag. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Either is fine with me. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Purtell < > > > > >> > > > apurt...@apache.org> > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I propose to eject hbase-native-client to GitHub > on > > > > >> > HBASE-19419 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell < > > > > >> > > > > apurt...@apache.org > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > hbase-native-client isn't hooked up to the > build. > > We > > > > >> don't > > > > >> > > > have a > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 'native' > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > profile like Hadoop that recurses into native > > > > component > > > > >> > > > > directories > > > > >> > > > > > > and > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > invokes cmake. This won't be available in any RC > > any > > > > RM > > > > >> > would > > > > >> > > > > > > generate. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Does one even make sense? Binaries built against > > > what? > > > > >> What > > > > >> > > do > > > > >> > > > > you > > > > >> > > > > > > > > propose? > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Mike Drob < > > > > >> > md...@apache.org> > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for the pointer, Andrew. This worked for > > me > > > > and > > > > >> I > > > > >> > was > > > > >> > > > > able > > > > >> > > > > > to > > > > >> > > > > > > > > start > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> hbase now and can resume testing. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I didn't mean to imply that Nick needs to > create > > > > human > > > > >> > > release > > > > >> > > > > > > notes, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > but > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> wanted to know if he had considered it in light > > of > > > > the > > > > >> > plan > > > > >> > > to > > > > >> > > > > do > > > > >> > > > > > so > > > > >> > > > > > > > for > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> 1.4.0. I think it's a nice to have, but > > definitely > > > > not > > > > >> > > > critical. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> (I'm still -1 due to the tar/tag discrepancy, > > > > however.) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Andrew > Purtell < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I think you need to delete > $TMPDIR/hbase-mdrob > > > (or > > > > >> > > whatever > > > > >> > > > is > > > > >> > > > > > > your > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > username) before testing the binaries. Looks > > like > > > > >> you've > > > > >> > > > been > > > > >> > > > > > > > testing > > > > >> > > > > > > > > a > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > later version and it's left data behind. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > We have not produced release notes beyond the > > > JIRA > > > > >> > > generated > > > > >> > > > > > ones > > > > >> > > > > > > > for > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > prior releases. We will soon. This is > > something I > > > > >> agreed > > > > >> > > to > > > > >> > > > > for > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 1.4.0. I > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > don't think it's fair to expect Nick to do it > > for > > > > the > > > > >> > last > > > > >> > > > > 1.1.x > > > > >> > > > > > > > > release > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > when it hasn't been done prior, but I'm not > > > saying > > > > >> don't > > > > >> > > do > > > > >> > > > it > > > > >> > > > > > if > > > > >> > > > > > > he > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> wants > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > to. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Mike Drob < > > > > >> > md...@apache.org > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > -1 (non-binding) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > general: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > + sign, sums good > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > src: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > - tar missing hbase-native-client (present > in > > > > tag) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > + can build from source (oracle jdk > 1.7.0_80) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > bin: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > - docs/doap_Hbase.rdf is very out of date > > > > (possibly > > > > >> > not > > > > >> > > > > > actually > > > > >> > > > > > > > an > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > issue) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > - unable to launch using bin/hbase-start.sh > > > (both > > > > >> > java 7 > > > > >> > > > and > > > > >> > > > > > 8), > > > > >> > > > > > > > got > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > following error in .out log file: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > WARNING! HBase file layout needs to be > > > upgraded. > > > > >> You > > > > >> > > have > > > > >> > > > > > > version > > > > >> > > > > > > > > null > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > and > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > I want version 8. Consult > > > > >> > http://hbase.apache.org/book. > > > > >> > > > html > > > > >> > > > > > for > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> further > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > information about upgrading HBase. Is your > > > > >> > hbase.rootdir > > > > >> > > > > > valid? > > > > >> > > > > > > If > > > > >> > > > > > > > > so, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > you > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > may need to run 'hbase hbck > -fixVersionFile'. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > System Info: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > mdrob@mdrob-MBP:/tmp/hbase-1. > > 1-0/hbase-1.1.13$ > > > > >> > sw_vers > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > ProductName: Mac OS X > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > ProductVersion: 10.12.6 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > BuildVersion: 16G1036 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > mdrob@mdrob-MBP:/tmp/hbase-1. > > 1-0/hbase-1.1.13$ > > > > >> java > > > > >> > > > > -version > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > java version "1.7.0_80" > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build > > > > >> 1.7.0_80-b15) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build > > > > 24.80-b11, > > > > >> > > mixed > > > > >> > > > > > mode) > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Mike > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Nick > > Dimiduk > > > < > > > > >> > > > > > > > ndimi...@apache.org > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> I'm happy to announce the first release > > > > candidate > > > > >> of > > > > >> > > > HBase > > > > >> > > > > > > 1.1.13 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> (HBase-1.1.13RC0) is available for > download > > at > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://dist.apache.org/ > > > > >> > repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1. > > > > >> > > > > > 1.13RC0/ > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://dist.apache.org/ > > > > >> > repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1. > > > > >> > > > > > 1.13RC0/ > > > > >> > > > > > > > >*. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> This is to be the final release from > > > branch-1.1. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Maven artifacts are available in the > staging > > > > >> > repository > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://repository.apache.org > > > > >> /content/repositories/ > > > > >> > > > > orgapach > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> ehbase-1182 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://repository.apache.org > > > > >> /content/repositories/ > > > > >> > > > > orgapach > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> ehbase-1182 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >* > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Artifacts are signed with my code signing > > > subkey > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> available in the Apache keys directory > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> https://people.apache.org/keys > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> /committer/ndimiduk.asc > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://people.apache.org/ > > > > >> > keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > and > > > > >> > > > > > in > > > > >> > > > > > > > our > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> KEYS > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> file http://www-us.apache.org/dist/ > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> hbase/KEYS <http://www-us.apache.org/dist > > > > >> /hbase/KEYS > > > > >> > >. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> There's also a signed tag for this release > > at > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://git-wip-us.apache. > > > > >> > > org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a= > > > > >> > > > tag > > > > >> > > > > ; > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> h=16a04e6629e614c7900c443f3a29cd > ba92dd7b7e > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://git-wip-us.apache. > > > > >> > > org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a= > > > > >> > > > tag > > > > >> > > > > ; > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> h=16a04e6629e614c7900c443f3a29cd > > ba92dd7b7e>* > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> The detailed source and binary > compatibility > > > > >> report > > > > >> > vs > > > > >> > > > > 1.1.12 > > > > >> > > > > > > has > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> been > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> published for your review, at > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://home.apache.org/~ndim > > > > >> iduk/1.1.12_1.1.13RC0_ > > > > >> > > > > compat_ > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> report.html > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://home.apache.org/~ndim > > > > >> iduk/1.1.12_1.1.13RC0_ > > > > >> > > > > compat_ > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> report.html > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >* > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> HBase 1.1.13 is the thirteenth and final > > patch > > > > >> > release > > > > >> > > in > > > > >> > > > > the > > > > >> > > > > > > > HBase > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> 1.1 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> line, continuing on the theme of bringing > a > > > > >> stable, > > > > >> > > > > reliable > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> database to > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> the Hadoop and NoSQL communities. This > > release > > > > >> > includes > > > > >> > > > > over > > > > >> > > > > > 40 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> resolved > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> issues since the 1.1.12 release; the > > majority > > > of > > > > >> > these > > > > >> > > > > > changes > > > > >> > > > > > > > are > > > > >> > > > > > > > > to > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > build > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> tooling rather than the product itself. > > > Notable > > > > >> > product > > > > >> > > > > > > > correctness > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > fixes > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> include HBASE-18665 and HBASE-19052. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> The full list of fixes included in this > > > release > > > > is > > > > >> > > > > available > > > > >> > > > > > at > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://issues.apache.org/ > > > > >> > > jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > > > > >> > > > > proj > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> ectId=12310753&version=12341346 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/ > > > > >> > > jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > > > > >> > > > > proj > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> ectId=12310753&version=12341346>* > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> and > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in > the > > > > >> > > distribution. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Please try out this candidate and vote > +/-1 > > by > > > > >> 23:59 > > > > >> > > > > Pacific > > > > >> > > > > > > time > > > > >> > > > > > > > > on > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Friday, 2017-12-08 as to whether we should > > > > release > > > > >> > > these > > > > >> > > > > > > > artifacts > > > > >> > > > > > > > > as > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > HBase > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> 1.1.13. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Nick > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, > > meaning > > > > >> torn > > > > >> > > from > > > > >> > > > > > > truth's > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > decrepit hands > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, > meaning > > > > torn > > > > >> > from > > > > >> > > > > > truth's > > > > >> > > > > > > > > decrepit hands > > > > >> > > > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > >> > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > >> > > > > > > Andrew > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning > > torn > > > > from > > > > >> > > > truth's > > > > >> > > > > > > decrepit hands > > > > >> > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Best regards, > > > > >> > Andrew > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > > > truth's > > > > >> > decrepit hands > > > > >> > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
