RAT check fails for me, below error I see in the log file, 4 Unknown Licenses
***************************************************** Files with unapproved licenses: hbase-spark/target/test-classes.-284428056.timestamp hbase-spark/target/classes.786562742.timestamp hbase-spark/target/maven-archiver/pom.properties hbase-prefix-tree/target/maven-archiver/pom.properties ***************************************************** CHANGES.txt file doesn't look correct. Downloaded the binary and checked the following, - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files, looks ok Verified the following in a non-kerberos setup, - On a one node setup did upgrade from 1.3.2-SNAPSHOT version to 2.0.0-beta-1 - Performed get and scan operation on data which were loaded in 1.3.2-SNAPSHOT version - Exercised basic shell commands - Ran LTT with 1M row, checked read and write operations - Poked around webUI - Started Rest server and executed few commands - Checked logs - Browsed book Regards, Ashish On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > The fourth release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1193 > > All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]. > > I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.7 at hash 026f535a7747b89003252ded9 > 585e827686aa79f > > This RC has some nice bug fixes over RC0-2 including fixing MOST of the > failing and flakey tests (We are still working through them). > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was in > previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, in-memory > compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. > > hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It is > meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed up > on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in > hearing from Coprocessor developers. > > The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3]. There > are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found > here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes). > > I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one more > beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of > January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a > rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found > running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for > beta-2 [5]. Check it out. > > One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so it > shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to be > fixed by beta-2). > > Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put out > this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let the > VOTE be open for 72 hours (Lets say Tuesday morning!) > > Thanks, > Your 2.0.0 Release Manager > > 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 > 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr > 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b > 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862 > 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4 > z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ >
