Oh, concurrent, there seems to be an errant geode build process making its
way around the build boxes according to INFRA.
S

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> Thanks Sean. Allen showed up on issues to report same. Trying to backfill
> his recommendation on how to up proclimit count.
> S
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> This sounds like it could be caused by the new feature in yetus 0.7.0 to
>> provide a configurable bound on resource usage, fyi.
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2018 08:53, "Stack" <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Looking...
>> > S
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 2:37 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Seems like an infra issue. In the morning(in China) there is no
>> available
>> > > node under the label ubuntu...
>> > >
>> > > Anyone who can access the infra mailing list please send an email? I'm
>> > not
>> > > in that list yet...
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > 2018-01-30 18:11 GMT+08:00 Peter Somogyi <psomo...@cloudera.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > The Nightly build started to fail as well.
>> > > > branch-2: https://builds.apache.org/job/
>> HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/
>> > > 223/
>> > > > artifact/output-jdk8-hadoop2/patch-unit-root.txt
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Peter Somogyi <
>> psomo...@cloudera.com
>> > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Recent precommit jobs are failing with OutOfMemoryError or
>> "[ERROR]
>> > > > unable
>> > > > > to create new native thread".
>> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11250/
>> > > > > artifact/patchprocess/patch-mvninstall-root.txt
>> > > > > <https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/
>> > > > 11250/artifact/patchprocess/patch-mvninstall-root.txt>
>> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11251/
>> > > > > artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Can someone with access rights to Apache Jenkins take a look?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Peter
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to