Why 2.1 doesn't contatin synchronous replication? This can be a experiment feature in 2.1?
2018-05-07 14:41 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>: > 2018-05-07 14:38 GMT+08:00 Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org>: > > > > As I volunteered to be the release manager for the 2.1 release line so > > let > > > me bring this up. > > +1 to Duo be RM of 2.1 release. > > > > > disabled from 2.0.0 release, for example, serial replication, and in > > memory compaction > > IIRC, in memory compaction is enabled in 2.0 and the default policy is > > BASIC. (please correct me if I misunderstand something.) > > > We disabled it by default in the end due to some performance issues... > > > > > > For the 2.1 release line, I would like to define it as the 'real' 2.x > > Seems the release date between 2.0 and 2.1 will be very close. Is it > > related to our new release plan? (IIRC, Andrew had suggested some great > > release plan based time. But I fail to find the thread...) > > > > > And for the 3.0.0 release, I think the new features should be decided > > ASAP. > > > We need to avoid the same thing happens again, i.e, spending 2 years to > > > release a major version... > > agreed! > > > > On 2018/05/07 00:52:07, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > As I volunteered to be the release manager for the 2.1 release line so > > let > > > me bring this up. > > > > > > For the 2.1 release line, I would like to define it as the 'real' 2.x > > > version of HBase. It should include the features which are reverted or > > > disabled from 2.0.0 release, for example, serial replication, and in > > memory > > > compaction. And also, the performance issues. And no more new features. > > If > > > no objections, I will start the release work soon. > > > > > > And for the 3.0.0 release, I think the new features should be decided > > ASAP. > > > We need to avoid the same thing happens again, i.e, spending 2 years to > > > release a major version... > > > > > > For now, the new features > > > Synchronous replication > > > CCSMap > > > Backup > > > Spark connector(is it still active?) > > > > > > And I suggest that we include this: > > > The read path refactoring(HBASE-20525) > > > > > > Suggestions are welcomed. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > >
