One week since we start the vote, and now we have 4 binding +1s, a 0, and
no -1s, so the vote passes. Let me close the vote.

There are still small issues for branch HBASE-19064, will merge back to
master after we fix them all.

Thanks all for voting.

2018-06-26 18:20 GMT+08:00 Ashish Singhi <ashishsin...@apache.org>:

> SGTM. +1
>
> Regards,
> Ashish
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:30 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Here is my +1.
> >
> > As the performance test shows that there is no performance downgrading if
> > we do not enable sync replication, and the feature basically works, I
> think
> > it is OK to merge it back to master branch. We will continue working on
> > polishing and optimizing it for the 3.0 release.
> >
> > 2018-06-26 14:52 GMT+08:00 OpenInx <open...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi guys
> > >
> > > I've tested the write performance on both master branch and
> HBASE-19064
> > > branch.  Here's the JIRA [1].
> > >
> > > The conclusion(Pasted from the comment):
> > > The QPS & AVG latency are similar when comparing the master branch with
> > > async replication and HBASE-19064 with async replication.
> > > BTW the QPS of HBASE-19064 with sync replication dropped about 13%, we
> > will
> > > continue to optimize the sync replication in phrase#2 [2].
> > >
> > > 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20751
> > > 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20422
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > 2018-06-21 18:26 GMT+08:00 mengli721014 on 163 dot com <
> > > > mengli721...@163.com
> > > > >:
> > > >
> > > > > 0
> > > > >
> > > > > 使用AquaMail for Android发送
> > > > > http://www.aqua-mail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 在 2018年6月21日 下午4:21:26 "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <palomino...@gmail.com> 写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > In HBASE-19064 we aim to implement sync replication feature for
> > HBase.
> > > > You
> > > > >> can see the design doc for more details on how it works
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/193D3aOxD-muPIZuQfI4Zo3_
> > > > >> qg6-Nepeu_kraYJVQkiE/edit#
> > > > >>
> > > > >> And now the feature basically works, we have tested it on real
> > > clusters,
> > > > >> and also provide the operational documentation in the ref guide.
> You
> > > can
> > > > >> see the 'Synchronous Replication' section in the ref guide of
> branch
> > > > >> HBASE-19064.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> There are known limitations for this feature, and we have
> > > > >> created HBASE-20422 to track them.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please vote:
> > > > >> [+1] Agree
> > > > >> [-1] Disagree
> > > > >> [0] Neutral
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to