+1 (non-binding)

  signatures and sums for src: OK
  signatures and sums for bin: OK
  signatures and sums for client bin: OK
  installed on pseudodistributed hadoop 2.7.7: on top of existing 2.0.4RC0
cluster
    old tables looked intact
  hbase shell: OK
  logs: OK
  UI: reported CSS issues in the earlier note.
  LTT 1M write/read 20%:
  UTs: NOK, see below
  compile from src OpenJDK 1.8.0_191: OK
  Java: write 1M: OK

overall, the following modules had failures
hbase-http
hbase-server
hbase-shaded-mapreduce
hbase-assembly

of those, hbase-http and hbase-server had the following errors,
respectively with mvn clean -Dhadoop-two.version=2.7.7 package -pl
:module-name

[ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
0.907 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.http.TestSpnegoHttpServer
[ERROR]
testAllowedClient(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.http.TestSpnegoHttpServer)  Time
elapsed: 0.672 s  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<200> but was:<401>
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.http.TestSpnegoHttpServer.testAllowedClient(TestSpnegoHttpServer.java:243)


  [ERROR] Errors:
[ERROR]   TestSeparateClientZKCluster.testBasicOperation:105 »
RetriesExhausted Failed a...
[ERROR]   TestSeparateClientZKCluster.testMasterSwitch:138 »
RetriesExhausted Failed aft...
[ERROR]
 TestSeparateClientZKCluster.testMetaMoveDuringClientZkClusterRestart:212 »
RetriesExhausted

hbase-shaded-mapreduce and hbase-assembly passed on individual runs





On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 3:21 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:

> Came up on the 2.1.1 vote too.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-dev/201810.mbox/%3ccaaayanpjcjzsb+ynefeczp4pk9xgxxecw+pnpppvu6_ogoe...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> S
>
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, the arrows? They are a little clustered. Still work. Would be nice
> > to get a fix up if some one was game.
> > Thanks,
> > S
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 5:04 PM Artem Ervits <artemerv...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Please see the image here https://photos.app.goo.gl/PziWBMAzXCwbZqmF8
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018, 2:23 PM Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org wrote:
> >>
> >> > attachments are stripped by the ASF mail servers. please link to an
> >> > upload somewhere.
> >> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:18 PM Artem Ervits <artemerv...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > still running UTs but Web UI looks off, please see attached photo.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 3:13 PM Artem Ervits <artemerv...@gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> actually scratch that, looks like the jira is still open.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 3:12 PM Artem Ervits <
> artemerv...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Stack, seeing HBASE-21458 on 2.1.2-rc0 first time I log into the
> >> > system where I deployed 2.0.4-rc0 prior to. Will re-deploy to confirm
> >> but
> >> > wonder if anyone else is seeing it.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 2:13 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Because of HBASE-21589.
> >> > >>>> S
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 3:14 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> > The first release candidate for HBase 2.1.2 is available for
> >> > download:
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.2RC0/
> >> > >>>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.2RC0/
> >*
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > Maven artifacts are also available in a staging repository at:
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> >
> >> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1242
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > Artifacts are signed with my key (DB9D313DA7874F29) published
> in
> >> our
> >> > >>>> > KEYS file at http://www.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > The RC corresponds to the signed tag 2.0.4RC0, which currently
> >> > points
> >> > >>>> > to commit
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> >   434bd0cd91d08353a8e7207ced530df3b3b1af76
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > HBase 2.1.2 is the third maintenance release in the HBase 2.0
> >> line,
> >> > >>>> > continuing on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database
> >> to
> >> > >>>> > the Hadoop and NoSQL communities. It fixes a critical issue
> found
> >> > >>>> > in the recent 2.0.3 and 2.1.1 releases (only), HBASE-21551.
> 2.1.2
> >> > >>>> > includes ~46 bug and improvement fixes done since the 2.1.1,
> >> > >>>> > ~ six weeks ago.
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 2.1.1
> has
> >> > been
> >> > >>>> > published for your review, at:
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.2RC0/compatibility_report_2.1.1vs2.1.2.html
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > The report shows no incompatibilities.
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > The full list of fixes included in this release is available in
> >> > >>>> > the CHANGES.md that ships as part of the release also available
> >> > >>>> > here:
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> >
> >> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.2RC0/CHANGES.md
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > The RELEASENOTES.md are here:
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.1.2RC0/RELEASENOTES.md
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > Please try out this candidate and vote +1/-1 on whether we
> should
> >> > >>>> > release these artifacts as HBase 2.1.2.
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. Given
> sufficient
> >> > votes
> >> > >>>> > I would like to close it on Tuesday, December 11th, 2018.
> >> > >>>> >
> >> > >>>> > Thanks,
> >> > >>>> > S
> >> > >>>> > ReplyForward
> >> > >>>> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to