Okay it sounds like we definitely need a better doc about this as a
starting point. I have some additional questions about failure handling;
should we go through them here or in a jira about improving how upgrade
from 2.0/2.1 gets handled?

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 07:33 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com wrote:

> Oh, you misunderstood me. It is just for master, you need make sure that
> before you killing the old version master, there is no RITs. And once the
> new master is up, everything is fine., as the new master will detect if
> there are old style AssignProcedure/UnassignProcedures, if so it will quit
> immediately.
>
> Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> 于2019年1月23日周三 下午9:21写道:
>
> > Yes, please. I don't think it's reasonable to expect no region
> transitions
> > during a rolling upgrade window; that would imply no servers can crash
> > during the upgrade.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 07:04 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > From 1.x it is OK, but from 2.0 or 2.1, we need make sure that there
> are
> > no
> > > RITs ongoing. We could see if we can make the upgrading more smoothly.
> > >
> > > Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com> 于2019年1月23日周三 下午8:56写道:
> > >
> > > > Our new internal branch is based on branch-2. And we already rolling
> > > > upgrade our staging cluster from our internal 0.98 branch to it... I
> > will
> > > > take a try for 2.0.* to 2.2.0.
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying we need to make sure it can do this? Or are you
> > > > > asserting that it already does?
> > > > >
> > > > It already does.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> 于2019年1月22日周二 下午9:48写道:
> > > >
> > > > > excellent! thanks for volunteering to get the 2.2 release line
> going
> > > > > Guanghao!
> > > > >
> > > > > > Need to add more document about how to rolling upgrade from
> > > > > 2.0.* or 2.1.* to 2.2.*. Meanwhile, need document about how rolling
> > > > upgrade
> > > > > from 1.* to 2.2.*.
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone confirmed that rolling upgrade to 2.2.0 works? I thought
> > it
> > > > > couldn't because of the change to assignment handling classes?
> > > > >
> > > > > > Now HBCK2 tool support branch-2's region assignments,
> > > > > too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you saying we need to make sure it can do this? Or are you
> > > > > asserting that it already does?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM Guanghao Zhang <
> zghao...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, all, there has been six months since we released 2.1.0. And
> > there
> > > > are
> > > > > > 429 issues which fixed version is 2.2.0[1]. Our internal branch
> > which
> > > > > based
> > > > > > branch-2 run ITBLL successfully recently. branch-2 is stable now
> > and
> > > it
> > > > > is
> > > > > > time to release 2.2.0. I volunteered to be the release manager
> for
> > > the
> > > > > 2.2
> > > > > > release line. And plan to cut branch-2.2 from branch-2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For 2.2.0, the biggest change is about AMV2[2]: HBASE-20881 is an
> > > > > > incompatible change and different implemenation with branch-2.0
> and
> > > > > > branch-2.1. Need to add more document about how to rolling
> upgrade
> > > from
> > > > > > 2.0.* or 2.1.* to 2.2.*. Meanwhile, need document about how
> rolling
> > > > > upgrade
> > > > > > from 1.* to 2.2.*. Now HBCK2 tool support branch-2's region
> > > > assignments,
> > > > > > too.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another features will be included:
> > > > > > 1. HBASE-20610 Procedure V2 - Distributed Log Splitting[3]
> > > > > > 2. HBASE-21649 Complete Thrift2[4]
> > > > > > 3. HBASE-16707 Improve throttling feature for production usage[5]
> > > > > > 4. HBASE-20886 [Auth] Support keytab login in hbase client[6]
> > > > > > 5. HBASE-20636 Introduce two bloom filter type :
> > > ROWPREFIX_FIXED_LENGTH
> > > > > and
> > > > > > ROWPREFIX_DELIMITED[7]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Open a issue HBASE-21747 to release 2.2.0[8]. Suggestions are
> > > welcomed.
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Guanghao
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21746?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.2.0
> > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20881
> > > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20610
> > > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21649
> > > > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16707
> > > > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20886
> > > > > > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20636
> > > > > > [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21747
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to