Thanks to Peter's link. I checked my failed tests, they are all in this flaky tests list. (Going to create some JIRAs for flaky tests if there aren't now)
+1 for this release now. Best, Xu On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:36 AM Peter Somogyi <psomo...@apache.org> wrote: > Just like Xu Cang I ran into similar test failures on Debian and many of > these are on the flaky list for branch-1 with 100% flakyness. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase-Find-Flaky-Tests/job/branch-1/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dashboard.html > > These are the failed tests for me: > regionserver.TestRegionServerMetrics > client.TestRegionLocationCaching > client.TestHCM > client.TestClientOperationInterrupt > util.TestHBaseFsck > master.cleaner.TestSnapshotFromMaster > master.TestMasterShutdown > replication.TestReplicationDroppedTables > filter.TestFilterListOrOperatorWithBlkCnt > mapreduce.TestSecureLoadIncrementalHFilesSplitRecovery > mapreduce.TestLoadIncrementalHFilesSplitRecovery > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 7:30 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I think HBASE-21727 should be partially reverted since it removed a > public > > method in HBaseConfiguration which is marked as IA.Public? > > > > la...@apache.org <la...@apache.org> 于2019年2月5日周二 上午1:54写道： > > > > > Based on my own testing I was going to vote +1.I built 1.5.0 from > > source, > > > and ran it with the tip of the Phoenix 4.x. > > > I regularly load a lot of data, execute Phoenix queries, etc. Nothing > > > undue, nothing undue in the logs either. > > > I'll try to reproduce the test failures. Since Andy can't reproduce > them > > > there is something flaky, most likely it's the tests, but that's, of > > > course, hard to say. > > > -- Lars > > > On Saturday, February 2, 2019, 4:03:53 PM PST, Andrew Purtell < > > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks. As I am not able to produce those unit test results we will > need > > > your help to diagnose the issues. Please file JIRAs as needed, post the > > > test output detail, etc. Thanks for trying the candidate out! > > > > > > The ITBLL results may be a tool usage problem. The numbers in the > failure > > > messages you posted are too round. I expect real failures to produce > more > > > irregular numbers. ITBLL can a bit hard to use. Contact me offline and > > I’ll > > > give you notes on how I ran the tests myself. > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 2019, at 3:45 PM, Xu Cang <xc...@salesforce.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > 2 jars sha12 verification: pass. > > > > Basic UI check: pass. > > > > Unit test. Some failures in hbase - server package. (see details > > below, > > > > not sure if these are flaky tests) > > > > ITBLL tests with slowDeterministic and serverKilling monky. Both got > > some > > > > failures. (Not sure if this is my environment issue since I am using > > *my > > > > laptop* to conduct this testing) > > > > Not voting for now since I have some doubts regarding my testing > > result. > > > > Will keep looking. > > > > > > > > > > > > - *Unit test failure: (failures are reproducable)* > > > > > > > > [INFO] Results: > > > > [INFO] > > > > [ERROR] Failures: > > > > [ERROR] > > > > > > > > > > TestRegionLocationCaching.testCachingForHTableMultiPut:133->checkRegionLocationIsCached:148 > > > > Expected non-zero number of cached region locations. Actual: 0 > > > > [ERROR] > > > > > > > > > > TestRegionLocationCaching.testCachingForHTableMultiplexerMultiPut:95->checkRegionLocationIsCached:148 > > > > Expected non-zero number of cached region locations. Actual: 0 > > > > [ERROR] > > > > > > > > > > TestRegionLocationCaching.testCachingForHTableMultiplexerSinglePut:73->checkRegionLocationIsCached:148 > > > > Expected non-zero number of cached region locations. Actual: 0 > > > > [ERROR] > > > > > > > > > > TestRegionLocationCaching.testCachingForHTableSinglePut:116->checkRegionLocationIsCached:148 > > > > Expected non-zero number of cached region locations. Actual: 0 > > > > [ERROR] TestReplicasClient.testHedgedRead:595 expected:<0> but > was:<1> > > > > [ERROR] > > > > > > > > > > TestFilterListOrOperatorWithBlkCnt.testMultiRowRangeWithFilterListOrOperatorWithBlkCnt:127 > > > > expected:<4> but was:<5> > > > > [ERROR] TestRegionServerMetrics.testRequestCount:137 Metrics > Counters > > > > should be equal expected:<59> but was:<89> > > > > [INFO] > > > > [ERROR] Tests run: 1870, Failures: 7, Errors: 0, Skipped: 17 > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > *ITBLL testing result: (failures are reproducable) * > > > > > > > > ./bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList > > > Loop > > > > 1 1 25000000 /tmp/itbll 1 -m slowDeterministic > > > > > > > > 2019-02-01 23:31:03,746 INFO [main] mapreduce.Job: map 100% reduce > > 100% > > > > 2019-02-01 23:31:03,746 INFO [main] mapreduce.Job: Job > > > > job_local221831554_0003 completed successfully > > > > 2019-02-01 23:31:03,758 INFO [main] mapreduce.Job: 175000018 > > > > Input split bytes=679 > > > > Combine input records=0 > > > > Combine output records=0 > > > > Reduce input groups=75000000 > > > > Reduce shuffle bytes=5175000018 > > > > Reduce input records=150000000 > > > > Reduce output records=0 > > > > Spilled Records=561948580 > > > > Shuffled Maps =3 > > > > Failed Shuffles=0 > > > > Merged Map outputs=3 > > > > GC time elapsed (ms)=1859 > > > > Total committed heap usage (bytes)=1846542336 > > > > HBase Counters > > > > BYTES_IN_REMOTE_RESULTS=0 > > > > BYTES_IN_RESULTS=31125001574 > > > > MILLIS_BETWEEN_NEXTS=934178 > > > > NOT_SERVING_REGION_EXCEPTION=7 > > > > NUM_SCANNER_RESTARTS=0 > > > > NUM_SCAN_RESULTS_STALE=0 > > > > REGIONS_SCANNED=12 > > > > REMOTE_RPC_CALLS=0 > > > > REMOTE_RPC_RETRIES=0 > > > > ROWS_FILTERED=12 > > > > ROWS_SCANNED=75000012 > > > > RPC_CALLS=14607 > > > > RPC_RETRIES=7 > > > > Shuffle Errors > > > > BAD_ID=0 > > > > CONNECTION=0 > > > > IO_ERROR=0 > > > > WRONG_LENGTH=0 > > > > WRONG_MAP=0 > > > > WRONG_REDUCE=0 > > > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Verify$Counts > > > > REFERENCED=75000000 > > > > File Input Format Counters > > > > Bytes Read=0 > > > > File Output Format Counters > > > > Bytes Written=108 > > > > 2019-02-01 23:31:03,764 ERROR [main] > > > > test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Verify: *Expected referenced count > > does > > > > not match with actual referenced count. expected referenced=25000000 > > > > ,actual=75000000* > > > > > > > > > > > > ./bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList > > > Loop > > > > 1 4 1000000 /tmp/itbll 4 -m slowDeterministic > > > > 2019-02-02 00:34:27,009 ERROR [main] > > > > test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList$Verify: Expected referenced count > > does > > > > not match with actual referenced count. expected referenced=4000000 > > > > ,actual=79000000 > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:17 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> The first HBase 1.5.0 release candidate (RC0) is available for > > download > > > at > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.5.0RC0/ and > > Maven > > > >> artifacts are available in the temporary repository > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1250/ > > > >> > > > >> The git tag corresponding to the candidate is '1.5.0RC0' > (ce6a6014da). > > > >> > > > >> A detailed source and binary compatibility report for this release > is > > > >> available for your review at > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.5.0RC0/compat-check-report.html > > > >> . I do not believe there are any reported compatibility issues that > > are > > > in > > > >> violation of our compatibility policy for minor releases, but if you > > > find > > > >> something and feel differently, please file a JIRA. > > > >> > > > >> A list of the 88 issues resolved in this release can be found at > > > >> https://s.apache.org/K4Wk . The 1.5.0 changelog is derived from the > > > >> changelog of the last branch-1.4 release, 1.4.9. > > > >> > > > >> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. > > > >> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will > > > try to > > > >> close it Thursday February 28, 2019 if we have sufficient votes. > > > >> > > > >> Prior to making this announcement I made the following preflight > > checks: > > > >> > > > >> RAT check passes (7u80) > > > >> Unit test suite passes (7u80, 8u181) > > > >> Opened the UI in a browser, poked around > > > >> LTT load 100M rows with 100% verification and 20% updates (8u181) > > > >> ITBLL 1B rows with slowDeterministic monkey (8u181) > > > >> ITBLL 1B rows with serverKilling monkey (8u181) > > > >> > > > >> Some of this testing was done with recent 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT versions. > > > During > > > >> the month of February I plan to perform a number of additional > tests, > > > >> including performance regression checks. As more results become > > > available I > > > >> will post them to this thread. > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Best regards, > > > >> Andrew > > > >> > > >
