Thanks stack. I thought I can create a new tag 2.2.1RC2 which have same
commits with 2.2.1RC1? It will take too long.

Stack <st...@duboce.net> 于2019年9月10日周二 下午12:57写道:

> I can make the new RC for you if you are busy Guanghao Zhang.
> S
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:42 PM Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Please don't change an RC that's already being voted on. Please make a
> new
> > RC.
> >
> > If folks are comfortable carrying their vote forward to an RC that is
> > noted to only differ in generating new binary artifacts they can do
> > so.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:40 PM Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Updated hbase-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz and hbase-2.2.1-client-bin.tar.gz. The
> > > Version.java was generated by saveVersion.sh and it not included in
> > > src.tar.gz. So hbase-2.2.1-src.tar.gz not affected.
> > >
> > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月10日周二 上午10:42写道:
> > >
> > > > I think all the tar balls should be replaced? Include the src and
> > > > client-bin.
> > > >
> > > > Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月10日周二 上午10:41写道:
> > > >
> > > > > Updated the
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.1RC1/hbase-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> > > > > with an revision. Thanks for pointing this.
> > > > >
> > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月9日周一 下午8:48写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Oh I haven't checked this field before, just checked the version
> of
> > > > > region
> > > > > > server...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ping Guanghao Zhang, Please confirm? I think this is a build
> > issue, so
> > > > > you
> > > > > > can still use the RC1 tag and built the new tarballs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Peter Somogyi <psomo...@apache.org> 于2019年9月9日周一 下午7:52写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Revision in version string is rUnknown both on Web UI and
> shell.
> > Are
> > > > we
> > > > > > > good to release 2.2.1 like this?
> > > > > > > Version 2.2.1, rUnknown, 2019年 09月 04日 星期三 11:43:00 CST
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Signature, checksum: OK
> > > > > > > - Changes, release notes, compatibility report: OK
> > > > > > > - Build from source: OK
> > > > > > > - Unit tests: Some failures as mentioned before but not
> > production
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > > - Shell simple commands: OK
> > > > > > > - LTT 1M rows: OK
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 11:56 AM OpenInx <open...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Agree, give my +1 (binding).
> > > > > > > > BTW  Peter Somogyi  also have commit the fix to related
> > branches.
> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 5:40 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > > > palomino...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Seems to be a UT issue? I do not think it is sufficient to
> > sink
> > > > an
> > > > > > RC?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > OpenInx <open...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月9日周一 下午4:35写道:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Seems the TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush is always failed
> > under
> > > > my
> > > > > > > host,
> > > > > > > > > > filed issue to address this:
> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22995
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >         * Signature: ok
> > > > > > > > > >         * Checksum : ok
> > > > > > > > > >         * Rat check (1.8.0_202): ok
> > > > > > > > > >          - mvn clean apache-rat:check
> > > > > > > > > >         * Built from source (1.8.0_202): ok
> > > > > > > > > >          - mvn clean install -DskipTests
> > > > > > > > > >         * Unit tests pass (1.8.0_202): failed
> > > > > > > > > >          - mvn test -P runAllTests
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 8:29 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > > > > > palomino...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1(binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rat check: Passed
> > > > > > > > > > > Verified sigs and sums: Matched
> > > > > > > > > > > Compatibility report: 100% compatible
> > > > > > > > > > > Built from src: OK
> > > > > > > > > > > Run all UTs(OpenJDK 8u202): As usual, some UTs in
> > > > > > > > > > > hbase-server&hbase-mapreduce failed with -PrunAllTests,
> > and
> > > > > then
> > > > > > > > passed
> > > > > > > > > > > when executing separately
> > > > > > > > > > > Start standalone cluster using the bin tarball: OK
> > > > > > > > > > > Web UI: Fine, the HBCK Report is a bit strange as I
> > haven't
> > > > run
> > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > checks
> > > > > > > > > > > yet, it says 'Checking started at -1 and generated
> > report at
> > > > > -1.
> > > > > > > > > Execute
> > > > > > > > > > > hbck_chore_run in hbase shell to generate a new
> > > > sub-report.'. I
> > > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > -1 is a bit confusing to users.
> > > > > > > > > > > Tried basic shell commands: OK
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sakthi <sak...@apache.org> 于2019年9月6日周五 下午3:37写道:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Java Version -
> > java-1.8.0-amazon-corretto-jdk_8.222.10-1
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cluster - Fully-Distributed (3 Nodes)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hadoop Version - 3.1.2
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - Built bin tarball & client tarball from Source
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - Checksums & Signatures - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - RAT check - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - ITBLL (8M) rows (& MR Tasks using Resource
> Manager
> > > > > > > > [Verified]) -
> > > > > > > > > > > *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - LTT (1M) rows - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - Shell [CRUD Operations] - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - Web UI, Logs - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - REST Server - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >       - CRUD Operations, Web UI, Logs - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - Thrift Server - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >       - CRUD Operations, Web UI, Logs - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - RS Groups - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - CHANGES, RELEASENOTES & Compatibility Report -
> > *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >    - HDFS directory structure - *OK*
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > -Sakthi
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:35 PM Guanghao Zhang <
> > > > > > > zghao...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 from me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz (openjdk 1.8.0_202)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Verified sha512sum: ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Start HBase in standalone mode: ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Verified with shell,
> > > > > > > > > > create/disable/enable/drop/get/put/scan/delete:
> > > > > > > > > > > ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Checked master/regionserver/table/region Web UI:
> ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hbase-2.2.1-src.tar.gz (openjdk 1.8.0_202)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Verified sha512sum: ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Build tarball: ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Start HBase in standalone mode: ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Verified with shell,
> > > > > > > > > > create/disable/enable/drop/get/put/scan/delete:
> > > > > > > > > > > ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Checked master/regionserver/table/region Web UI:
> ok
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Guanghao Zhang <zghao...@gmail.com> 于2019年9月4日周三
> > > > 下午5:52写道:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote on this release candidate (RC1) for
> > Apache
> > > > > > HBase
> > > > > > > > > 2.2.1.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HBase 2.2.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on is 2.2.1RC1. The release
> > files,
> > > > > > > > including
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.1RC1/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging
> > repository
> > > > at:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1332/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signatures used for HBase RCs can be found in
> this
> > > > file:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hbase/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The list of bug fixes going into 2.2.1 can be
> > found in
> > > > > > > included
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > CHANGES.md and RELEASENOTES.md available here:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.1RC1/CHANGES.md
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.1RC1/RELEASENOTES.md
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > A detailed source and binary compatibility report
> > for
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > available at:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.2.1RC1/api_compare_2.2.1RC1_to_2.2.0.html
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > To learn more about Apache HBase, please see
> > > > > > > > > > > http://hbase.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Guanghao Zhang
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to