Thanks for starting up this thread Andrew. Lets move the stable pointer if a vote or two that branch-2.2 is basically working for folks . We could push a new release -- a 2.2.3 which had bug fixes only -- and move the stable pointer here. It helps that hbase-operator-tools w/ a 1.0.0 hbck2 was released yesterday.
Thanks, S On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:55 AM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: > In a recent discussion regarding hbck parity between branches 1 and 2, > Stack also proposed moving the stable pointer forward to 2.2. Raising this > as a separate point of discussion because I think it is time. > > What do others think? > > What is the in production experience with 2.2? Can anyone offer > testimonial? > > If more need be done, what is the consensus criteria for moving the stable > pointer forward? > > Also, I think we should add another stable pointer, like “stable-1”, to > point at 1.4.11 after it is released. To be updated to 1.5.0 after it is > released (I promise a renewed push when back from vacation next week) and > after we confirm it stable under load where I work (at least) and under > long term ITBLL stress. I mention this to get it out of the way. The state > of branch-1 should be mostly orthogonal to this discussion. It’s time to > declare HBase 2 stable and move the pointer forward to acknowledge this. > >