Thanks for starting up this thread Andrew. Lets move the stable pointer if
a vote or two that branch-2.2 is basically working for folks . We could
push a new release -- a 2.2.3 which had bug fixes only -- and move the
stable pointer here. It helps that hbase-operator-tools w/ a 1.0.0 hbck2
was released yesterday.

Thanks,
S

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:55 AM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> In a recent discussion regarding hbck parity between branches 1 and 2,
> Stack also proposed moving the stable pointer forward to 2.2. Raising this
> as a separate point of discussion because I think it is time.
>
> What do others think?
>
> What is the in production experience with 2.2? Can anyone offer
> testimonial?
>
> If more need be done, what is the consensus criteria for moving the stable
> pointer forward?
>
> Also, I think we should add another stable pointer, like “stable-1”, to
> point at 1.4.11 after it is released. To be updated to 1.5.0 after it is
> released (I promise a renewed push when back from vacation next week) and
> after we confirm it stable under load where I work (at least) and under
> long term ITBLL stress.  I mention this to get it out of the way. The state
> of branch-1 should be mostly orthogonal to this discussion. It’s time to
> declare HBase 2 stable and move the pointer forward to acknowledge this.
>
>

Reply via email to