Thanks Duo.

I assigned this to myself, but if anyone is reading this who wants to do it
right now, please take the issue. I will get to it in the next couple of
months as part of more generally preparing for a 2.5.0. I do think we will
want the new minor release some time this year, as the justifications
accumulate. I'd like to RM it unless there are objections or we have
another volunteer.


On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:18 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Filed HBASE-25853 for backporting tracing.
>
> Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> 于2021年5月5日周三 上午7:20写道:
>
> > My understanding is that backup work is not ready for inclusion in 2.x.
> >
> > The talk of removing it from the master branch and proposed adoption of
> the
> > feature through more involvement from some community members were not so
> > long ago.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 4, 2021, 15:49 Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Correct me if I am mistaken but backup tests failing on master in
> > precommit
> > > is common enough to warrant ignoring them as unrelated. Is it not fully
> > > baked yet?
> > >
> > > +1 for backport of tracing. If we do the backport to branch-2 that
> would
> > be
> > > one new compelling reason for a 2.5.0 release.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:34 AM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 5:40 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have interest in backporting HBASE-22120 to branch-2?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I think there would be interest in getting your tracing effort
> > onto
> > > > branch-2 ; there's quite a few "watchers" on that Jira.
> > > >
> > > > What about the backup work? Has it stabilized enough for backport?
> > > >
> > > > Conversely, if we don't have a killer new feature for 2.5, does that
> > mean
> > > > it's time for 3.0?
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2021年5月1日周六 上午5:46写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Inline
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:11 PM Nick Dimiduk <
> ndimi...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Heya,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd like to have a planning discussion around our 2.x releases.
> > 2.4
> > > > > seems
> > > > > > > to be humming along nicely, I think we won't have a need for
> 2.3
> > > much
> > > > > > > longer. Likewise, it seems like it should be time to start
> > planning
> > > > > 2.5,
> > > > > > > but when I look at the issues unique to that branch [0], I
> don't
> > > see
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > big new feature that justifies the new minor release. Rather, I
> > > see a
> > > > > > > number of items that should be backported to a 2.4.x. Do we
> have
> > a
> > > > big
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > > feature in the works? Should we consider backporting something
> > from
> > > > > > master?
> > > > > > > Or maybe there's enough minor changes on 2.5 to justify the
> > > > release...
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > if so, which of them motivate users to upgrade?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So, to summarize:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - How much longer do we want to run 2.3?
> > > > > > > - What issues in the below query can be backported to 2.4? Any
> > > > > > volunteers?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for starting this discussion, Nick.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Looking at that report, issues like HBASE-24305, HBASE-25793, or
> > > > > > HBASE-25458 that clean up or reduce interfaces or refactor/move
> > > classes
> > > > > are
> > > > > > probably excluded from a patch release by our guidelines.
> > Conversely,
> > > > > they
> > > > > > would not provide much value if backported.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I also agree that the motivation for 2.5 here is thin as of now.
> > > > > Refactors,
> > > > > > interface improvements, or deprecation removals will be
> > nice-to-haves
> > > > > when
> > > > > > there is a 2.5 someday.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All the others in the report are either operational improvements
> > that
> > > > > would
> > > > > > be nice to backport or bug fixes that should be backported.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There might be case by case issues with compatibility during the
> > pick
> > > > > > backs, but we can deal with them one at a time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you are looking for a volunteer to do this, as 2.4 RM I am
> game.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - What's the big new feature that motivates 2.5?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Nick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [0]:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Fixed%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.5.0%20AND%20fixVersion%20not%20in%20(2.4.0%2C%202.4.1%2C%202.4.2%2C%202.4.3)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> > > truth's
> > > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > > decrepit hands
> > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrew

Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
   - A23, Crosstalk

Reply via email to