I say go for it. Can you create it as a subtask under the
umbrella HBASE-24749 and PR to that feature branch? I had been working on
the tasks related to avoid "creating files in temp then rename" for flushes
and compactions (HBASE-25391 and HBASE-25392), had managed to successfully
run it with the PersistedStoreEngine from HBASE-25395.

Em ter., 8 de jun. de 2021 às 08:02, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Can not comment on the google doc so just reply here.
>
> Recently I read a bit of Hudi and Iceberg, they both use files on the
> filesystem for committing changes by default, so you can write to the data
> directory directly without worrying about mess up the data files.
>
> If no big concerns, I could start a implement a POC by going with the plain
> file approach.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> 于2021年5月27日周四 上午3:21写道:
>
> > Thanks Stack! (access given, as google probably told you already).
> >
> > Please keep me honest.
> >
> > On 5/26/21 12:29 PM, Stack wrote:
> > > And, what is there currently is a nice write-up....
> > > S
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:26 AM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can I have comment access please Josh?
> > >> S
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 8:24 PM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi folks,
> > >>>
> > >>> This is a follow-on for the HBASE-24749 discussion on storefile
> > >>> tracking, specifically focusing on where/how do we store the list of
> > >>> files for each Store.
> > >>>
> > >>> I tried to capture my thoughts and the suggestions by Duo and
> > Wellington
> > >>> in this google doc [1].
> > >>>
> > >>> Please feel free to ask for edit permission (and send me a note if
> your
> > >>> email address isn't one that I would otherwise recognize :) ) to
> > >>> correct, improve, or expand on any other sections.
> > >>>
> > >>> FWIW, I was initially not super excited about a per-Store file, but,
> > the
> > >>> more I think about it, the more I'm coming around to that idea. I
> think
> > >>> it will be more "exception-handling", but avoid the long-term
> > >>> operational burden of yet-another-important-system-table.
> > >>>
> > >>> - Josh
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yzjvQvQfnT-M8ZgKdcQNedF8HssTnQR2loPkZtlJGVg/edit?usp=sharing
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to