Update: Been running ITBLL with chaos (slowDeterministic) over the last
24hrs on a 5 node cluster. So far no issues, will monitor for the next
24hrs and prepare an RC if no issue surfaces.

On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 5:49 PM Bharath Vissapragada <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Update: All the patches are in. I have a local RC that I'm installing in a
> cluster to test them out under load and chaos. Might take a couple more
> days before I publish the bits for the community.
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 9:33 AM Bharath Vissapragada <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone for chiming in. 1.7.1 it is. Working on a couple of final
>> patches related to documentation and serialization fix ups, will try to
>> create RC0 by the end of this week.
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 5:45 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Checked the download page, 1.7.0 is release on 6.12, nearly a month ago,
>>> so
>>> I'm +1 on 1.7.1 and include all the new commits.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Reid Chan <[email protected]> 于2021年7月3日周六 下午8:07写道:
>>>
>>> > +1 for 1.7.1
>>> >
>>> > There are some improvements about thrift in branch-1, worth a minor
>>> > release.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 1:39 AM Bharath Vissapragada <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > As some of you may know, we have an incompatible serialization
>>> backport
>>> > > that landed in 1.7.0 (courtesy of yours truly) that is causing
>>> upgrade
>>> > > issues (thanks to Viraj for noticing it, more details in HBASE-26021
>>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26021>). We have to
>>> > withdraw
>>> > > the release so as to not let 1.x users upgrade to it and instead do
>>> > another
>>> > > release in the same line. We can either do a 1.7.0.1 (= 1.7.0 +
>>> > HBASE-26021
>>> > > fix) or do a 1.7.1 which includes all the commits since 1.7.0 which
>>> is
>>> > > fairly small (listed below).
>>> > >
>>> > > ==== delta since 1.7.0 release =====
>>> > > 7d0a72be14 (origin/branch-1) HBASE-22923 min version of RegionServer
>>> to
>>> > > move system table regions (#3438)
>>> > > 28f36f4619 HBASE-26021: Undo the incompatible serialization change in
>>> > > HBASE-7767 (#3435)
>>> > > 395eb0c8e0 HBASE-25130 - Fix master in-memory server holding map
>>> after:
>>> > > (#3402)
>>> > > b2f8ec993e HBASE-26025 Add a flag to mark if the IOError can be
>>> solved by
>>> > > retry in thrift IOError (#3429)
>>> > > fd2f8a581f HBASE-26013 Get operations readRows metrics becomes zero
>>> after
>>> > > HBASE-25677 (#3410)
>>> > > 7e57fecda8 HBASE-21674:Port HBASE-21652 (Refactor ThriftServer making
>>> > > thrift2 server inherited from thrift1 server) to branch-1 (#2941)
>>> > > 5263b8cf40 HBASE-26004: port HBASE-26001 (cell level tags invisible
>>> in
>>> > > atomic operations when access control is on)to branch-1 (#3387)
>>> > > 2e24bad826 HBASE-25984: Avoid premature reuse of sync futures in
>>> FSHLog
>>> > > (#3371) (#3398)
>>> > > a40f4583e3 Set version on branch-1 to 1.7.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> > > 0fd6eeb012 HBASE-25910 - Fix port assignment test (#3308)
>>> > > 782e24bd9b HBASE-25924 Re-compute size of WAL file while removing
>>> from
>>> > > WALEntryStream (#3316)
>>> > > =============================
>>> > >
>>> > > One of these (marked in red above) is a critical fix that was
>>> causing us
>>> > > issues, so I'd prefer to include it in either of the paths we take.
>>> > Andrew
>>> > > was suggesting 1.7.0.1 in the jira comments (correct me if your
>>> > definition
>>> > > of 1.7.0.1 is different than mine) while I'm leaning towards doing a
>>> > 1.7.1
>>> > > since the delta is fairly small. Thoughts?
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm happy to be an RM for this release unless there is any objection.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > Bharath
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to