Have one more last minute bug fix: HBASE-27069 - SecureBulkload permission regression.
Em seg., 30 de mai. de 2022 às 18:56, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> escreveu: > All known significant issues are resolved. Flaky tests have been found > using repeated suite invocation on x86_64 and aarch64 test hosts. Use this > link to find the open issues: https://s.apache.org/hbase-2.5.0-issues > > Load testing with LTT, ITBLL, and ITLCC has completed successfully. > > Chaos testing with ITBLL will be underway soon. > > The RC0 will be posted tomorrow. There will be a compatibility report > associated with it that may generate some discussion. I am not expecting > the RC0 to pass but we need it in order for people to begin evaluation of > it and related concerns. > > Of the remaining open issues: > - HBASE-26192 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26192> [minor] > is implemented but I am still working on a mock based unit test for it, > which is half done, so you can assume this one is done. There is a PR > awaiting review for the servlet itself. Implementation is simple. > - HBASE-26844 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26844> [minor] > is something I hope one of my colleagues will address soon but is not > urgent and can be deferred to 2.5.1, as it is only a test flake. > - HBASE-27022 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27022> [minor] > is an issue with SFT but SFT will be marked experimental so this has been > deferred. > - HBASE-27064 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27064> [minor] > is fixed and awaiting PR review. > - HBASE-27067 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27067> [minor] > is fixed and awaiting PR review. > - HBASE-27070 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27070> [minor] > is an issue with the Region Visualizer in what can be expected to be a > common test configuration. This one should be addressed before release. > - All other issues are minor priority filings for unit tests that are > sometimes flaky. In some cases the flakiness manifests only on aarch64, > which is a platform as yet of secondary concern. > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew >
