Stephen -- I just pushed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27592
to branch-2.5. I'm not sure it needs to be a blocker for 2.5.3. I leave it
to the RM's here.  I noticed this issue incidentally, but our
netty.hadoop.version was out of sync with our hadoop-two.version.  This
would cause NoSuchMethodErrors in a new test I merged to branch-2, so I
imagine this mismatch could cause issues for users if they are using
hadoop-2. It's been in since 2.5.0, but might be nice to fix in this
release since we're making one.

I set the fix version to 2.5.3, but if RM's decide this isn't blocker
enough feel free to put it in 2.5.4. Sorry for the late breaking patch, I
just noticed this.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:29 AM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <tak...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks Andrew, I merged it and currently have been running the
> do-release-docker.sh
> <http://do-release-docker.sh>
> (with -f publish) for 2+ hours, will check again
> tomorrow.
>
> -Stephen
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 5:24 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Approved the PR
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:53 PM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <tak...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > nvm....I found the issue and it's just a duplicated test classname
> > > causing the NullPointerException.
> > >
> > > filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27589
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27589>,
> please help
> > > to review it.
> > >
> > > -Stephen
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 2:17 PM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> tak...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > During the execution of publish-dist (part of the do-release.sh
> <http://do-release.sh>),
> I
> > > > found the strange problem with commit
> > > > 748ec455b33d29ed007b0143efa73b7409248da7 from HBASE-27498, the test
> in
> > > >
> > >
> hbase-it/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/TestConnectionImplementation.java
> > > > is blocking the javadoc target test-aggregate-no-fork when running
> mvn
> > > > -B --settings <local repo setting.xml> site -DskipTests with the
> > > > following ERROR.
> > > >
> > > > I tried to revert 748ec455b33d29ed007b0143efa73b7409248da7 or revert
> > > > just the TestConnectionImplementation class, then the javadoc/site
> > > > completes without error. I also tried to checkout just branch-2.5 and
> > > > branch-2.4, execute the build and javadoc/site execution, but it is
> > > > still failing.
> > > >
> > > > # capture using JDK17 , it has the same NullPointerException
> exception
> > > > for JDK8 and JDK11 without much detail.
> > > > error: An internal exception has occurred.
> > > > (java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke
> > > > "com.sun.source.util.TreePath.getCompilationUnit()" because the
> return
> > > > value of
> > >
> "com.sun.source.util.DocTrees.getPath(javax.lang.model.element.Element)"
> > > > is null)
> > > > Please file a bug against the javadoc tool via the Java bug reporting
> > > page
> > > > (https://bugreport.java.com
> <https://bugreport.java.com>)
> after checking the Bug Database
> > > > (https://bugs.java.com
> <https://bugs.java.com>
> )
> > > > for duplicates. Include error messages and the following diagnostic
> in
> > > > your report. Thank you.
> > > > java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke
> > > > "com.sun.source.util.TreePath.getCompilationUnit()" because the
> return
> > > > value of
> > >
> "com.sun.source.util.DocTrees.getPath(javax.lang.model.element.Element)"
> > > > is null
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.toolkit.util.Utils.getFileObject(Utils.java:871)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.formats.html.SourceToHTMLConverter.convertClass(SourceToHTMLConverter.java:198)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.formats.html.SourceToHTMLConverter.generate(SourceToHTMLConverter.java:137)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.formats.html.SourceToHTMLConverter.convertRoot(SourceToHTMLConverter.java:112)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.formats.html.HtmlDoclet.generateOtherFiles(HtmlDoclet.java:218)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.toolkit.AbstractDoclet.startGeneration(AbstractDoclet.java:218)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.doclets.toolkit.AbstractDoclet.run(AbstractDoclet.java:115)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.doclet.StandardDoclet.run(StandardDoclet.java:103)
> > > > at
> > >
> jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.tool.Start.parseAndExecute(Start.java:556)
> > > > at jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.tool.Start.begin(Start.java:393)
> > > > at jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.tool.Start.begin(Start.java:342)
> > > > at jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.tool.Main.execute(Main.java:63)
> > > > at jdk.javadoc/jdk.javadoc.internal.tool.Main.main(Main.java:52)
> > > > 1 error
> > > > 100 warnings
> > > >
> > > > May I ask if you checkout the branch-2.5 and run the following to see
> > > > if I'm the only one hitting the error ? the command is mvn clean
> > > > install -DskipTests && mvn -B site -DskipTests
> > > >
> > > > Secondly, other than reverting this change, do you have any
> suggestion
> > > > how we can debug javadoc generation (I tried javadoc -J-Xmx2G
> @options
> > > > @argfile -verbose, but this didn't tell me anything...)
> > > >
> > > > -Stephen
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:01 PM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> tak...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Fyi I’m executing the release build via do-release-docker.sh
> <http://do-release-docker.sh>,
> ran till
> > > the mvn site and Java doc generation.
> > > > >
> > > > > But it failed with 20:05:46 [ERROR] javadoc: error -
> > > java.lang.NullPointerException , and few error/warning for @result tag
> as
> > > well as @link not found for the generated proto class
> BlockingInterface.
> > > > >
> > > > > I’m still working on it, if possible, please avoid to push commits
> to
> > > branch-2.5
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stephen
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 1:29 PM Andrew Purtell <
> apurt...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Sounds good Stephen, please ping me as you need assistance.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 9:32 PM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> > > tak...@apache.org>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Thanks Andrew and Bryan, all the blockers for branch-2.5 should
> have
> > > > >> > been resolved.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I'm running the compatibility check again, and will continue the
> > > > >> > release tasks tomorrow or Monday morning (PST).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > -Stephen
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:16 AM Bryan Beaudreault
> > > > >> > <bbeaudrea...@hubspot.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > You probably saw, but just to close the loop here --
> HBASE-27579
> > > got
> > > > >> > > resolved, so no blocker there anymore. Thanks all!
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:30 PM Andrew Purtell <
> > > apurt...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > I think HBASE-27539 should be reverted from the releasing
> > > branches.
> > > > >> > Keeping
> > > > >> > > > it in branch-2 and master would be fine, we do frequently
> > > change LP
> > > > >> > > > interface details in minor releases. It is the compatibility
> > > break in a
> > > > >> > > > patch release with a real affected downstream (Phoenix)
> that is
> > > a
> > > > >> > problem.
> > > > >> > > > As RM I would go ahead and do that, I suggest the same to
> you.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:25 PM Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> > > > >> > tak...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Thanks Andrew for sharing the normal flow and helped me
> off
> > > this
> > > > >> > > > > thread. I have tried steps 1 and 2, and found the
> following
> > > JIRAs may
> > > > >> > > > > need a few days before closing for 2.5.3 RC.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > HBASE-27579 under review
> > > > >> > > > > HBASE-27539 broke the patch version backward compatibility
> > > with
> > > > >> > > > > StoreFileReader, pending confirmation if we can revert
> > > > >> > > > > HBASE-27578 should be merging soon
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > -Stephen
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:34 AM Andrew Purtell <
> > > > >> > andrew.purt...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > Sure. We are not rushing.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > Welcome to the RM club. You have commit privileges so
> all
> > > steps
> > > > >> > > > outlined
> > > > >> > > > > below should be achievable. Let me briefly outline the
> steps
> > > for
> > > > >> > making a
> > > > >> > > > > release. We can deal with details privately by email.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 1. Run the compatibility checker. Verify no changes from
> > > prior
> > > > >> > release
> > > > >> > > > > that are not allowed. Exceptions are fine if you as RM are
> > > willing to
> > > > >> > > > > defend them when the PMC has questions. If there are
> problems
> > > that
> > > > >> > need
> > > > >> > > > > fixing, fix them.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 2. Clean up fix versions in JIRA. All issues targeting
> the
> > > release
> > > > >> > eg
> > > > >> > > > > 2.5.3 should be resolved with that fix version in the set
> if a
> > > > >> > commit was
> > > > >> > > > > made, and if no commit but still resolved the fix version
> > > should be
> > > > >> > > > removed
> > > > >> > > > > from the set. If the issue is not resolved the fix version
> > > should be
> > > > >> > > > > removed and replaced with one for the next eg 2.5.3 ->
> 2.5.4.
> > > When
> > > > >> > you
> > > > >> > > > are
> > > > >> > > > > done a report for the fix version of your release
> candidate
> > > should
> > > > >> > show
> > > > >> > > > all
> > > > >> > > > > issues resolved.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 3. Run the create-release script. It will handle the
> > > production and
> > > > >> > > > > staging of artifacts end to end. This includes the
> production
> > > of
> > > > >> > release
> > > > >> > > > > notes derived from JIRA. This includes tagging in git on
> the
> > > branch.
> > > > >> > The
> > > > >> > > > > script will ask for your Apache committer credentials at
> the
> > > start.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 4. Take the artifacts produced by create-release and
> sanity
> > > check
> > > > >> > them.
> > > > >> > > > > Check sums and signatures. Unpack and check included
> contents.
> > > > >> > Launch a
> > > > >> > > > > minicluster, load some data with PE or LTT. The same
> actions
> > > you’d
> > > > >> > take
> > > > >> > > > if
> > > > >> > > > > voting on someone else’s release candidate. Assuming no
> issue,
> > > > >> > proceed.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 5. Send the vote mail produced by create-release to get
> the
> > > vote
> > > > >> > > > started.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 6. Respond to comments on the vote thread as required.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 7. Close the vote once sufficient votes have been
> received.
> > > Give
> > > > >> > it a
> > > > >> > > > > week at least. If it seems like voting is slow to complete
> > > gently
> > > > >> > prod
> > > > >> > > > the
> > > > >> > > > > PMC on dev@.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 8. Create and push a release tag in git. Move the
> release
> > > candidate
> > > > >> > > > from
> > > > >> > > > > staging to release in svn.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 9. Edit download.xml and trigger a new site build. Wait
> for
> > > your
> > > > >> > > > changes
> > > > >> > > > > to go live.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > 10. Send out a release announcement email.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2023, at 8:49 PM, Tak Lon (Stephen) Wu <
> > > > >> > tak...@apache.org
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > If we’re not rushing, I would like to help release or
> at
> > > least
> > > > >> > learn
> > > > >> > > > > as a
> > > > >> > > > > > > shadow release manager how to do it end-to-end.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > I will ping you separately.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >> > > > > > > Stephen
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 8:35 PM Andrew Purtell <
> > > > >> > > > > andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > >> Ok.
> > > > >> > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>> On Jan 18, 2023, at 8:28 PM, Bryan Beaudreault <
> > > > >> > > > > bbeaudrea...@hubspot.com.invalid>
> > > > >> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>> I just submitted a blocker jira:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27579
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27579>
> > > > >> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27579
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27579>
> >
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>> This issue is old, not new to 2.4.x or 2.5.x. But I
> > > think we
> > > > >> > should
> > > > >> > > > > try
> > > > >> > > > > > >> to
> > > > >> > > > > > >>> get the fix into the next patch releases, since it
> is
> > > data loss
> > > > >> > > > > related.
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:19 PM Andrew Purtell <
> > > > >> > > > apurt...@apache.org
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> I've cleaned up JIRA for fix versions 2.4.16 and
> > > 2.5.3. There
> > > > >> > is a
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> dependabot PR to fix a warning, see HBASE-27575.
> When
> > > this is
> > > > >> > > > > merged, I
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> assume tomorrow, I'll go ahead and prepare the two
> > > releases,
> > > > >> > > > unless
> > > > >> > > > > Nick
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> you want to pick one. Just say which.
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:07 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > > > >> > > > > palomino...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> Good. Thanks Nick and Andrew. Since we have two
> > > releases, I
> > > > >> > think
> > > > >> > > > > each
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> of you can pick one branch to release :)
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> Anyway, let me make a new thirdparty release and
> bump
> > > the
> > > > >> > > > > dependencies
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> first, IIRC there is at least a CVE fix in netty.
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> Thanks.
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
> > > 于2023年1月17日周二
> > > > >> > 03:13写道:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>> I’ll be happy to run a release or both of them as
> > > needed
> > > > >> > too.
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Jan 16, 2023, at 6:44 AM, Nick Dimiduk <
> > > > >> > ndimi...@apache.org
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 15:02 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > > > >> > > > > palomino...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> If the release managers do not have enough
> time,
> > > do we
> > > > >> > have
> > > > >> > > > any
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>> volunteers?
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I’m happy to help out as needed.
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> Nick
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> --
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> Best regards,
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> Andrew
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> It's what we’ve earned
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting
> on
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>> - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
> > > > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > >> > > > > > >>
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > --
> > > > >> > > > Best regards,
> > > > >> > > > Andrew
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
> > > > >> > > > It's what we’ve earned
> > > > >> > > > Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
> > > > >> > > > Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
> > > > >> > > > - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> Best regards,
> > > > >> Andrew
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
> > > > >> It's what we’ve earned
> > > > >> Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
> > > > >> Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
> > > > >> - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sent from Gmail Mobile
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> > Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
> > It's what we’ve earned
> > Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
> > Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
> > - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
>

Reply via email to