Thanks for sharing the opinions @Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> , @Duo Zhang, @Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>.
I have enabled pipelines to run for master and branch 3 in the PR. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Fri, 23, 2024, 3:13 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 4:34 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Agree on Andrew's opinion. > > > > We could enable it for master and branch-3 first. > > I will help with stablizing. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2024年2月23日周五 02:14写道： > > > > > > > Would like to gather opinion on which branches should we > > prioritize/enable > > > > JDK 17 pipelines > > > > > > master > > > branch-3 > > > > > > When the JDK 17 pipelines have stabilized for those, then consider > > branch-2 > > > and the release branches. Probably by then most issues would have a > prior > > > developed solution that can be easily adapted or cherry picked. > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:40 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > As all the active branches have support for JDK17 it would be better > to > > > > align build pipelines, pre-commit jobs and nightlies accordingly. > > > > > > > > I have raised PR to support the same > > > > https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5689. > > > > > > > > Would like to gather opinion on which branches should we > > prioritize/enable > > > > JDK 17 pipelines. > > > > > > > > Feel free to share your thoughts. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew > > > > > > Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles - > > > It's what we’ve earned > > > Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long? > > > Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on > > > - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse > > >
