Thank you.
I've merged the patches, and will update Docs ASAP.

Istvan

On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 12:27 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote:

> Okay, let's go for it, István. This will be our policy for active
> release lines going forward. Go ahead with your patches and please
> update the compatibility guidelines in the book relating to supported
> Hadoop versions and CVE mitigation, as appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 7:57 AM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I have not been following. I’ve been away for a while and am getting
> back up to speed. Thanks for summarizing the discussion so far.
> >
> > I support it too. For purely practical reasons, I admit. We have to be
> CVE clean, to the extent possible, with annoying documentation requirements
> when known issues remain in a deployment image.
> >
> > We’d also want 3.4 for the fix for the lease leak on close bug in the
> DFS client. That was the cause of hundreds of half-closed WALs leaked in
> production before we analyzed the issues and rolled out a mitigation. We
> use FSHLog, for reasons. Users who do the same are subject to the same
> issue and bundling 3.4.1 libraries (and also documenting the required site
> configuration) is the solution.
> >
> > > On Jan 8, 2025, at 10:36 PM, Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > We've updated the default Hadoop version on the non-release branches
> to
> > > 3.4.1, and have discussed doing the same on the release branches.
> > > I don't know if you've been following the discussion threads about this
> > > Andrew, but it basically a dilemma of
> > >
> > > * risking undetected problems on HBase patch release upgrade, and
> causing
> > > problems for some existing users
> > > * VS shipping the release with old known CVEs in the included Hadoop,
> which
> > > hinders HBase adoptation due to being perceived as insecure.
> > >
> > > Duo and I support this, but Nick has reservations, and deferred to you.
> > >
> > > What do you think ?
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 5:44 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Nihal,
> > >>
> > >> I think we could take HBASE-29028 and HBASE-28983 in the upcoming
> release
> > >> right now. Let me follow up on the respective PRs.
> > >>
> > >> For HBASE-28832, I think it should have some time to bake. Maybe in
> > >> branch-2 first, for kicking the tires, and then we could backport it
> to the
> > >> releases.
> > >>
> > >>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 9:23 PM Nihal Jain <nihalj...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Dávid Paksy is working on backporting changes for upgrading to
> bootstrap
> > >>> 5.3.3.
> > >>>
> > >>> Following PRs are pending for this:
> > >>> 1) HBASE-29028 Backport missing UI patches to branch-2.5
> > >>> 2) HBASE-28832 Upgrade from bootstrap 3.4.1 to non vulnerable version
> > >> 5.3.3
> > >>> 3) HBASE-28983 Static resources are not loaded on REST web UI pages
> in
> > >> dev
> > >>> mode
> > >>>
> > >>> Changes for first two JIRAs are up review. Third is good to have.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please suggest if we want to consume these changes for upcoming
> release
> > >> or
> > >>> should we wait on merging these until release is done.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Nihal
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2025/01/06 17:49:10 Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > >>>> Related to 2.5.11, there are 61 resolved issues*, and one pending
> that
> > >>> may
> > >>>> land in the next couple of days.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * - https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12354955
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 9:37 AM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> We are overdue for a maintenance release of 2.5.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If you have any pending work that should go in to such a release,
> > >>> please
> > >>>>> get it committed in the next couple of days. Please let me know if
> > >> you
> > >>> have
> > >>>>> any blocking issues preventing that.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Andrew
> > >>
> > >> Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
> > >>    It's what we’ve earned
> > >> Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
> > >> Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
> > >>   - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
> > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
> > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera
> > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
> > > ------------------------------
> > > ------------------------------
>


-- 
*István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
*Email*: st...@cloudera.com
cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
[image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
[image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera
on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
------------------------------
------------------------------

Reply via email to