Thanks Duo.
I also don't think this is a blocker for release.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 6:47 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think usually it is OK to add methods for interfaces which are not
> designed to be implemented by our users, like AsyncBufferedMutator and
> AsyncBufferedMutatorBuilder. The opposite is ScanResultConsumer, which
> is designed to be implemented by our users.
>
> So for me I do not think this is a blocker for a new patch release,
> but I suggest we add default implementation for these methods if
> possible.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2025年7月18日周五 01:28写道：
> >
> > I should have said rel/2.6.3, not 2.6.3RC2, sorry about that. It is a cut
> > and paste mistake.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:24 AM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > A recent source incompatible change was committed affecting
> > > AsyncBufferedMutator and AsyncBufferedMutatorBuilder, both marked as
> Public
> > > interfaces.
> > >
> > > I see this is currently in 2.6.3RC2 and is in the RC for 2.5 I am
> > > considering.
> > >
> > > Does this present a problem? I am seeking the consensus opinion.
> > >
>
--
Best regards,
Andrew
Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
It's what we’ve earned
Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
- A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
