Hi, I have two questions:
- How do the current maven site reports fit into this ? I am not necessarily against removing them from the website, as I don't think they are particularly useful on the public website (especially since they include data on the development branch) but we should not remove them without explicit discussion. - How would the update/publish workflow (and automation) look like ? Can wee hook the site build step into maven ? If not how can the publishing be automated ? Istvan On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:48 PM Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> wrote: > This looks quite amazing! > Very nice!! > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 3:10 AM Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This all looks fine to me in principle. I say go for it. > > > > Thanks a lot Yurii. > > > > -n > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:08 AM Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I'm posting here Yurii's answer as it did not found this discuss > thread: > > > > > > Hope this reaches the thread well. > > > > > > I updated the website and now it loads perfectly even with JS disabled > in > > > the browser. Some features might not be working, e.g., the dropdown > menus > > > in the navbar, but no-JS fallback can be added to them later. So it > won't > > > work as good as with JS, but it will be fully functional. > > > > > > Check this out https://hbase-landing.vercel.app/ > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. okt. 13., > H, > > > 15:07): > > > > > > > I'm not at all opposed to JavaScript being present. My concern is > that > > > the > > > > site still works for a browser that has JavaScript disabled. A pure > > > > JavaScript app is not acceptable to me. > > > > > > > > However it's implemented, if this new system can render static HTML > > (and > > > > everything else needed) at build time, that the essential assets are > > > > delivered without the need for JavaScript, then I have no > objections. I > > > > welcome the improvement! > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 3:01 PM Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, it's all JavaScript, at least that's what is being > served > > to > > > > my > > > > > > browser. Can it be generated as old fashioned html + css? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's all JavaScript, that's right, but all the code in the end is > > > > composed > > > > > into HTML + CSS + JS. Currently the html document looks empty, but > we > > > can > > > > > render complete HTML in advance at build time. So we will have the > > HTML > > > > > document, and some CSS/JS assets, all can be served as static > files. > > > Even > > > > > current version of the website uses some JS, but it's just not > > written > > > > > manually. Having a website without any JS nowadays is literally > > > > impossible > > > > > because any UI assumes interactivity. > > > > > > > > > > Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. okt. > > 13., > > > H, > > > > > 13:24): > > > > > > > > > > > I forgot to mention that this landing page uses Tailwind CSS and > it > > > is > > > > > not > > > > > > based on Maven site plugin because using a Maven site skin we'd > > have > > > to > > > > > > override every piece of CSS. > > > > > > > > > > > > However, it's all JavaScript, at least that's what is being > served > > to > > > > my > > > > > >> browser. Can it be generated as old fashioned html + css? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll check with Yurii on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. okt. > > > 13., > > > > H, > > > > > > 12:29): > > > > > > > > > > > >> The look is really nice -- in line with our existing site, but a > > > more > > > > > >> modern look. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> However, it's all JavaScript, at least that's what is being > served > > > to > > > > my > > > > > >> browser. Can it be generated as old fashioned html + css? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 8:56 AM Dávid Paksy <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hi Team, > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Yurii Palamarchuk (my team-mate at dayjob) created a nice > > proposal > > > > for > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > face-lift of the HBase website. > > > > > >> > You can check it out: https://hbase-landing.vercel.app/ > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > It's one page currently. If the direction is good, he will > > finish > > > > all > > > > > of > > > > > >> > them. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Please share your thoughts. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > > >> > Dávid > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer *Email*: [email protected] cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
