On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 18:28 +0530, Asankha C. Perera wrote: > Hi Oleg > >> I would try reading into a ByteBuffer with zero remaining capacity. > >> Hopefully this would give us channel status without moving any data into > >> the buffer. > > Thats a great idea.. I'll try that, and maybe we could incorporate > > that into the trunk later > Unfortunately this didn't work .. I guess one must really try to read at > least one byte to detect the end. We could use a one byte ByteBuffer to > read just one byte, and if one was read, transfer that to the session > buffer, but I doubt if that would actually give any benefit >
Then there appears to be no way around attempting a read into the session buffer and having to deal with the case of some content actually ending up in the buffer. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
