On 6 June 2013 16:03, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 15:57 +0100, sebb wrote:
>> On 6 June 2013 15:43, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 15:24 +0100, sebb wrote:
>> >> On 6 June 2013 15:08, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 08:57 -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
>> >> >> Can you elaborate as to what you feel are the advantages of gradle?  
>> >> >> Why do
>> >> >> you want to switch over?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Karl
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Both build frameworks have their pros and cons. There is enough material
>> >> > on the web specially after several high profile projects having moved to
>> >> > Gradle.
>> >> >
>> >> > I am quite fine with Maven itself but some its plugins are just plain
>> >> > horrible. One of which is the site plugin.
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> And the release plugin.
>> >>
>> >
>> > And assembly. I just did not want to sound too negative about Maven.
>>
>> I find that OK.
>>
>
> Right. And how about having to fix line delimiters with an And
> script? ;-)

That's an unusual use-case.

>> >> > Now that we have to use
>> >> > SvnPubSub for web site publishing, Maven Site plugin simply causes more
>> >> > trouble and helping with the process. And here comes the main drawback
>> >> > of Maven for me as a HC release manager: one can do anything with Maven
>> >> > but nontrivial operations simply require creation of a custom binary
>> >> > plugin.
>> >>
>> >> I agree here.
>> >>
>> >> > The trouble with this approach in the context of ASF is that
>> >> > every little modification of deployment logic would require a bloody
>> >> > release vote.
>> >>
>> >> In Commons we agreed to use lazy consensus for Commons Parent pom updates.
>> >>
>> >> Since build helpers are not really part of the formal HC release, I
>> >> don't see why that approach should not be extended to ASF-specific
>> >> Maven plugins created for use in HC.
>> >>
>> >
>> > What does it take to adopt the same model for parent, notice-plugin and
>> > (to be created) hc-style-check?
>>
>> I think it's enough for us to hold a vote.
>>
>
> For all three at the same time?

Why not? They all serve a similar purpose.

> Oleg
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to