[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPASYNC-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13871892#comment-13871892
 ] 

Christian Schneider commented on HTTPASYNC-65:
----------------------------------------------

The bundle symbolic name issue is fixed with HTTPASYNC-60. If you prefer to 
have separate modules I will adapt my patch to keep the module.
It is not strictly necessary to add custom code in a separate module though. 
You can simply mark the OSGi specific dependencies as optional and make sure 
the OSGi code is not refered to by any non OSGi code. If you are interested in 
this variant I can try to adapt the httpclient module to this scheme. 

> HttpAsyncClient does not work in OSGi
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPASYNC-65
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPASYNC-65
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpAsyncClient
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0 Final
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>             Fix For: 4.0.1
>
>         Attachments: HTTPASYNC-65-1.patch
>
>
> We are using the http async client for CXF. In the current trunk we reference 
> the 4.0 version. 
> Unfortunately the bundle does not work for us. I spotted two problems:
> 1. The Bundle-SymbolicName is the same as the one in httpclient
> In the pom there is:
> <Bundle-SymbolicName>${project.groupId}.httpclient</Bundle-SymbolicName>
> See 
> http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/httpcomponents/httpasyncclient-osgi/4.0/httpasyncclient-osgi-4.0.pom
> 2. The bundle refers to commons logging api 1.1.3 but pax logging only 
> provides 1.0.4. I will also try to fix this for pax logging. 
> I think it should be possible to open up the import range for pax logging so 
> you also accept the 1.0.x version.
> I checked out the current trunk and was able to make it work by doing some 
> changes in the poms.
> I found that httpasyncclient has separate projects for the normal jar and the 
> OSGi jar. Is this really necessary? I was able to switch the normal jar to 
> packaging bundle and configure it there. This has the advantage that people 
> only have to use one maven artifact for OSGi and non OSGi usage. This is 
> espacially intersting for frameworks like cxf that live in both worlds.
> I will provide a patch with my changes. So you can review what I did.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org

Reply via email to