Am 2017-05-04 um 16:51 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski:
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 15:59 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
While I do say +1 the vote is incomplete:
You missed to provide the target Git repo names. E.g., you won't name
httpcomponents/project/ => project right?
Does this need to be in the vote? I thought it would only matter when
asking infra to do the actual migration. If it does I can restart the
vote.
It should be at least mentioned that repo names must be changed. No need
to revote, let's spin a new discussion when this vote is over.
I'd propose the following:
httpcomponents-core
httpcomponents-client
httpcomponents-parent
httpcomponents-stylecheck
httpcomponents-site
I would go with
hc instead of httpcomponents if infra allow it.
I prefer compact names too, but repo names have to resemble like project
names. Consider that people are listing our repos at git.apache.org or
GitHub and filter for 'http' simpyl because new artifactIds are
'http...', though I have no strong preference here. Let the majority
decide later.
It might also reasonable to reconsider the artifactId of project
because
<artifactId>project</artifactId> is quite general. httpcomponents-
parent
sounds reasonable to me.
By all of means feel free to fix it.
Any objects from others here? If there won't be any within a few days,
I'll go ahead and do it.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
