https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/HDT
Hurray! Thanks, Atlassian! We should find a place to link to it. I started a review of my own submission. Entirely unnecessary as a review, but you can look at the interface for reviewing. You'll need to log in to participate in the review; I'm not sure exactly where the option to join the review is located, but I did enable the option for anyone to join. https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/cru/CR-15 In my experience, this is most useful when there's discussion needed on specific areas. If you click through to the individual source files, you can comment on the changed lines by clicking on them and entering your comment. I think the current difference between Fisheye's review functionality and the full Crucible functionality is that this commenting ability seems to be limited to lines in the changesets, so it's patch review, rather than full code review. My suggestion is that we view this as a convenient tool for discussion, rather than some process gate / big stick. That is, if one of us wants to discuss the specifics of some patch, just start up a review of the relevant patch(es), and send an invite to the list. We can send a summary of the review when done -- where "done" just means the discussion is over. Note that you can upload a patch and initiate a review *before* submitting it, if you want input beforehand. Unfortunately, this doesn't have the beneficial effect on searching for us I'd hoped for, because their robots.txt is all-excluding. I'm not sure why that would be. Searching for, e.g. MapReduceNature turns up old Hadoop branches. I'm not sure what we can do to improve the situation. Ideas?
