Thanks Brent. We'll keep an eye out for it.

Hunter

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 12:42 AM Brent <[email protected]> wrote:

> I filed this issue so we have something to track:
> https://github.com/apache/helix/issues/1921
>
> I'm attempting to get Log4J 2.16.x building and running properly locally.
> I will submit a PR if I can get it working.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 8:40 AM Brent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Hunter, much appreciated!  I will try to put together a patch with
> > what I've done for remediation elsewhere (good news is it's not much
> since
> > Helix still inherits Log4J 1.x).  If you wouldn't mind, I might also file
> > an issue to consider upgrading to Log4J 2.16.x that was just pushed out (
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/d6v4r6nosxysyq9rvnr779336yf0woz4).  That
> > one will require some more thought to make sure things don't break I
> > suspect.
> >
> > ~Brent
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 1:42 PM Hunter Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> This is being discussed. Feel free to post a patch if you're interested
> >> (but do let us know so there's no duplicate effort being made here).
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:33 PM Brent <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > [Feel free to take this offline or out-of-band if this is an
> >> inappropriate
> >> > place to discuss this]
> >> >
> >> > Is there any hotfixing planned as a result of the Log4J zero day going
> >> > around?
> >> >
> >> > Reference: https://www.lunasec.io/docs/blog/log4j-zero-day/
> >> > CVE: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228
> >> >
> >> > From what I can tell, Helix seems to be building with
> >> > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.slf4j/slf4j-log4j12/1.7.14
> >> which in
> >> > turn maps to https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/log4j/log4j/1.2.17
> >> >
> >> > The exploit is more prevalent in the 2.x versions of Log4J, but there
> >> are
> >> > scenarios where 1.x is exploitable and it's been pointed out that 1.x
> is
> >> > also end of life and has other vulnerabilities.
> >> >
> >> > See:
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/608#issuecomment-990494126
> >> >
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > ~Brent
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to