> On Aug. 6, 2013, 8:51 p.m., Kishore Gopalakrishna wrote:
> > I am not able to view the diff in the browser, can you upload it again. 
> > Also can you provide the same info in the jira and add the jira number to 
> > rb description.

the diff seems to be filled with whitespace and format changes makes it hard to 
follow.

based on the description I would guess this is VERY LIKELY the cause behind the 
SEAS issues we experience a while back. 


- Santiago


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13345/#review24745
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 6, 2013, 8:18 p.m., Zhen Zhang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/13345/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 8:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for helix, Kanak Biscuitwala, Kishore Gopalakrishna, and Shi 
> Lu.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> FINALIZE callbacks are sent async via CallbackHandler#reset(), while Zk 
> callbacks are queued in ZkEventThread. It's possible that we are handling a 
> FINALIZE callback before all Zk callbacks are cleaned up. This creates race 
> conditions, for example, in zk session expiry, when a GenericController gets 
> a FINALIZE callback, it unsubscribes all listeners via 
> ZkClient#unsubscribe(), but Zk callbacks leftover in ZkEventThread comes 
> later, and re-subscribe all listeners, causing zk watcher leaking. 
> 
> This is observed by setting up two controllers and expire the leader (by 
> simulating a long gc). The second controller takes the leadership and add all 
> listeners, but when the former leader recovers from gc, it gets leftover Zk 
> callbacks and re-subscribe the live-instance listener hence react to all 
> live-instance changes.
> 
> We fix this by introducing an expected-notification-type field in 
> CallbackHandler. The field acts like the state for a CallbackHandler. We then 
> defines the possible state transitions for a CallbackHandler. For example,  
> at first CallbackHandler expects an INIT type notification, then it could be 
> either CALLBACK type or FINALIZE type. If a CALLBACK type is received, then 
> we expect either CALLBACK or FINALIZE type. If a FINALIZE type is received, 
> then we expect INIT type. By defining this state machine in CallbackHandler, 
> we can ignore any notifications of CALLBACK type after we already finalize a 
> CallbackHandler. CallbackHandler can only receive notifications of CALLBACK 
> type after it gets re-initialized again.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13345/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> all tests passed locally
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> helix-diff
>   https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/08/06/helix.diff
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zhen Zhang
> 
>

Reply via email to