I got the following test failures on the release candidate...
groupby2.q
groupby3.q
groupby4.q
groupby5.q
groupby6.q
not sure if this is just in my env or if others have seen this...
A sample of the diff is below and seems to be related to some plan ordering or
some change in plan. Is anyone else getting this?
Ashish
-------------------------
[junit] diff -b -I'\(\(<java version=".*"
class="java.beans.XMLDecoder">\)\|\(<string>.*/tmp/.*</string>\)\|\(<string>file:.*</string>\)\|\(<string>[0-9]\{10\}</string>\)\|\(<string>/.*/warehouse/.*</string>\)\)'
/data/users/athusoo/tmp/hive-0.6.0/src/build/ql/test/logs/positive/groupby6.q.xml
/data/users/athusoo/tmp/hive-0.6.0/src/ql/src/test/results/compiler/plan/groupby6.q.xml
[junit] 352,353c352
[junit] < <object class="java.lang.Enum"
method="valueOf">
[junit] <
<class>org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode</class>
[junit] ---
[junit] > <object
class="org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode" method="valueOf">
[junit] 878,879c877
[junit] < <object class="java.lang.Enum" method="valueOf">
[junit] <
<class>org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode</class>
[junit] ---
[junit] > <object
class="org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.plan.GroupByDesc$Mode" method="valueOf">
--------------------------
________________________________________
From: John Sichi [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:22 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] hive 0.6.0 release candidate 0
Yeah, the scripts should only be needed in configurations where JDO is told not
to automatically update the schema. This is recommended for production
environments.
For this particular release, taking a downtime while running the scripts is a
good idea due to the nature of the changes (e.g. altering the primary key on
COLS). That needn't be true in general for additive-only changes.
JVS
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:38 PM, John Sichi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The tarballs are at
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jvs/hive-0.6.0-candidate-0
>>
>> Carl did some sanity testing on it already, but any additional testing you
>> can do before voting helps to ensure a quality release.
>>
>> JVS
>>
>>
>
> I am checking it out now. It seems like since i have used two trunk
> versions since hive the view related tables have already been created.
> I do not need the update script.
