[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14302507#comment-14302507
 ] 

Owen O'Malley commented on HIVE-9188:
-------------------------------------

Suggestions:
* Pick m to always be a multiple of 64 (since you are using longs are the 
representation)
* change the representation of BloomFilter in orc_proto to record the number of 
hash functions and not the size or fpp.
* use fixed64 for the bit field
* you'll also need to update the specification in the wiki with the change to 
the format 
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+ORC#LanguageManualORC-orc-specORCFormatSpecification)
* revert the spurious change to CliDriver.java
* revert the spurious change to .gitignore
* it seems suboptimal to convert long values to bytes before hashing


> BloomFilter in ORC row group index
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-9188
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9188
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: File Formats
>    Affects Versions: 0.15.0
>            Reporter: Prasanth Jayachandran
>            Assignee: Prasanth Jayachandran
>              Labels: orcfile
>         Attachments: HIVE-9188.1.patch, HIVE-9188.2.patch, HIVE-9188.3.patch, 
> HIVE-9188.4.patch, HIVE-9188.5.patch, HIVE-9188.6.patch
>
>
> BloomFilters are well known probabilistic data structure for set membership 
> checking. We can use bloom filters in ORC index for better row group pruning. 
> Currently, ORC row group index uses min/max statistics to eliminate row 
> groups (stripes as well) that do not satisfy predicate condition specified in 
> the query. But in some cases, the efficiency of min/max based elimination is 
> not optimal (unsorted columns with wide range of entries). Bloom filters can 
> be an effective and efficient alternative for row group/split elimination for 
> point queries or queries with IN clause.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to