Can we include HIVE-2368 in the RC? Otherwise, drop performance will be too slow for tables with lots of partitions.
-----Original Message----- From: John Sichi [mailto:jsi...@fb.com] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:03 PM To: dev@hive.apache.org; Carl Steinbach Subject: Re: Apache Hive 0.8.0 Release Candidate 0 I did the following testing on this RC. Getting Started: basic sanity testing with pokes table Source: build and package (did not run ant test yet, will do so on next RC) PDK: built and ran examples/test-plugin Upgrade: tested script for MySQL upgrade from 0.7.1 (starting with fresh 0.7.0 schema creation script) to 0.8 using partitioned invites table I logged HIVE-2529 for the missing PostgreSQL metastore upgrade script. RELEASE_NOTES.txt has regressed to the 0.6 content (0.7.1 has the correct content). For README.txt, maybe we should use the new wording from the wiki for the first line since it's now the official project trademark description? And throw in a bunch of (TM)'s for good measure, since we love them so much? Looking forward to RC1! JVS On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > Apache Hive 0.8.0 Release Candidate 0 is available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~cws/hive-0.8.0-candidate-0/ > > This RC does not include patches for the following tickets which are > currently marked as blockers: > > * HIVE-2391. Published POMs in Maven repo are incorrect > * HIVE-2521. Update wiki links in README > > We plan to include patches for both of these tickets in RC1, but would > appreciate it if folks would look at this RC in an attempt to find any > other blockers. > > Thanks! > > Carl
