Richard,

A quick eye-balling of the code doesn't show anything that could
potentially be a blocker for this upgrade. Also +1 on staying on the latest
and greatest. Please feel free to open up a JIRA and submit the patch.

Also just out of curiosity, what are you really using a derby backed store
for?

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Richard Hillegas <rhil...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:

>
>
> I haven't received a response to the following message, which I posted last
> week. Maybe my message rambled too much. Here is an attempt to pose my
> question more succinctly:
>
> Q: Does anyone know of any reason why we can't upgrade Hive's Derby version
> to 10.12.1.1, the new version being vetted by the Derby community right
> now?
>
> Thanks,
> -Rick
>
> > I am following the Hive build instructions here:
> >
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/GettingStarted#GettingStarted-InstallationandConfiguration
> > .
> >
> > I noticed that Hive development seems to be using an old version of
> Derby:
> > 10.10.2.0. Is there some defect in the most recent Derby version
> > (10.11.1.1) which prevents Hive from upgrading to 10.11.1.1? The only
> > Hive-tagged Derby bug which I can find is
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6358. That issue doesn't
> seem
> > to be version-specific and it mentions a resolved Hive issue:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8739.
> >
> > Staying with 10.10.2.0 makes sense if you need to run on some ancient
> JVMs:
> > Java SE 5 or Java ME CDC/Foundation Profile 1.1. Hadoop, however,
> requires
> > at least Java 6 according to
> > https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopJavaVersions.
> >
> > Note that the Derby community expects to release version 10.12.1.1 soon:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenTwelveOneRelease. This might be
> a
> > good opportunity for Hive to upgrade to a more capable version of Derby.
> >
> > I mention this because the Derby version used by Hive ends up on the
> > classpath used by downstream projects (like Spark). That makes it awkward
> > for downstream projects to use more current Derby versions. Do you know
> of
> > any reason that downstream projects shouldn't override the Derby version
> > currently preferred by Hive?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Rick
>



-- 
Swarnim

Reply via email to