On a related note, we should discuss whether it makes sense to remove the rc tags once the vote closes. I think it reduces confusion. What do others think?
.. Owen On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > According to Apache Infra, we should be creating our release tags in the > rel/* space. Tags with names that start with "rel/" can never be changed > once they are pushed to Apache, so be careful. *smile* But having a > unmodifiable tag is good to make sure that no one is tempted to "fix" a > release. > > Can you please recreate the tag with the name "rel/release-2.1.0". I'd > also suggest that you sign the tag with your GPG key with "git tag -s > rel/release-2.1.0 <commit=id>" > > Thanks, > Owen > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez < > jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >> Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given >> their comments and votes. >> >> The tally is as follows. >> >> 4 +1s: >> Prasanth Jayachandran >> Gunther Hagleitner >> Sushanth Sowmyan >> Jason Dere >> >> No 0s or -1s. >> >> Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release >> Apache Hive 2.1.0 has passed! We'll now roll the release out to the >> mirrors. >> >> In addition, I have created HIVE-14059 to fix the issue with the >> missing headers for the 2 files (thanks for catching that one >> Sushanth). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/17/16, 3:54 PM, "Jason Dere" <jd...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> >> >Checked signatures, ran build and a few tests. >> >+1 >> >________________________________________ >> >From: Sushanth Sowmyan <khorg...@gmail.com> >> >Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 3:30 PM >> >To: dev@hive.apache.org >> >Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 >> > >> >Actually, to be more explicit, per Thejas' case of the top level >> >license taking precedence, this RC has my +1. >> > >> >On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan <khorg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I will happily rescind my -1 and even convert it to a +1 if the top >> >> level license does hold. I thought that the RAT check was a necessary >> >> blocker. >> >> >> >> (Although, if the top level license does cover across the board, we >> >> may want to open a new discussion on whether having a license >> >> requirement for every source file is necessary in the first place, and >> >> tweak the definition of the rat check so it does not fail it in this >> >> case.) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Thejas Nair <thejas.n...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't think the missing headers for 2 files mandates a respin of >> >>> this RC . It is not really a case of 'incompatible' license or code >> >>> that shouldn't be shipped. >> >>> We have a top level license file that covers the entire project, >> >>> including these files. >> >>> IMO, We should fix it if there is a new RC for some other reason. But >> >>> this alone doesn't seem to make new RC necessary. >> >>> >> >>> Sushanth, Can you please reconsider your -1 ? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Sushanth Sowmyan <khorg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> -1, terribly sorry I didn't check for this earlier, but the RAT check >> >>>> fails for this. >> >>>> >> >>>> If you run mvn apache-rat:check , then you see the following issue: >> >>>> >> >>>> Unapproved licenses: >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> /Users/sush/t/rel/apache-hive-2.1.0-src/common/src/java/org/apache/hive/common/util/DateParser.java >> >>>> >> >> /Users/sush/t/rel/apache-hive-2.1.0-src/common/src/test/org/apache/hive/common/util/TestDateParser.java >> >>>> >> >>>> Basically, these two files are missing the apache license header. We >> >>>> need to add them in. >> >>>> >> >>>> All other things are good, though. It has the oracle fix I asked for >> >>>> in RC2, md5s and signatures check out, compilation works on source >> >>>> package, and I'm able to run the hive binary from the binary package. >> >>>> I also tried a number of tests, and I've run a rat test on the >> release >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez >> >>>> <jcamachorodrig...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> >>>>> Apache Hive 2.1.0 Release Candidate 3 is available here: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jcamacho/hive-2.1.0-rc3 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Maven artifacts are available here: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehive-1057/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Source tag for RC3 is at: >> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/release-2.1.0-rc3 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Voting will conclude in 72 hours. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hive PMC Members: Please test and vote. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >> > >