> On Jan. 17, 2017, 2:13 p.m., Aihua Xu wrote:
> > beeline/src/java/org/apache/hive/beeline/BeeLine.java, line 1185
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/55605/diff/1/?file=1606448#file1606448line1185>
> >
> >     FileHistory implementation will load 500 (default) lines during this 
> > constructor (it's the limitation of FileHistory) and then will resize to 
> > the specified size.
> >     
> >     Potentially there is a problem to see OOM, but I guess that's the best 
> > we can do right now to limit the output. The user in general wouldn't edit 
> > the history file.

Yes you are right, Aihua. At least for now we have an option to control the 
history row size.


- Eric


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/55605/#review161864
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 17, 2017, 7:22 a.m., Eric Lin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/55605/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 17, 2017, 7:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Aihua Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-15166
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15166
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently Beeline does not provide an option to limit the max size for 
> beeline history file, in the case that each query is very big, it will flood 
> the history file and slow down beeline on start up and shutdown.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   beeline/src/java/org/apache/hive/beeline/BeeLine.java 65818dd 
>   beeline/src/java/org/apache/hive/beeline/BeeLineOpts.java 9f330e3 
>   beeline/src/main/resources/BeeLine.properties 141f0c6 
>   beeline/src/test/org/apache/hive/beeline/TestBeelineArgParsing.java d73d374 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/55605/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing + a simple test case.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Eric Lin
> 
>

Reply via email to