+1
> On May 15, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> Alan.
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Sergio Pena <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Gunther Hagleitner <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Sankar Hariappan <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 9:03 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Stricter commit guidelines
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/05/18, 9:30 PM, "Sahil Takiar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Owen O'Malley <[email protected]
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Peter Vary <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 - Hoping for something like this for a long while! Thanks for
>>> taking
>>>>>> this up all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 15, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Forgot to mention the length of the vote in original message.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's leave the vote open for a shorter period than usual, for
>>> instance
>>>>>> 48 hours, i.e., till Wednesday 10pm PST. Situation can only get
>> worse
>>>>> than
>>>>>> it is now if we do not take action for a longer period.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As Alan suggested, vote passes if there is a lazy majority (at
>>> least 3
>>>>>> votes, more +1s than -1s).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Jesús
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/15/18, 8:37 AM, "Andrew Sherman" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:34 AM Rui Li <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Prasanth
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:44 PM -0700, "Jesus Camacho
>> Rodriguez"
>>> <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> After work has been done to ignore most of the tests that were
>>>>> failing
>>>>>>>>> consistently/intermittently [1], I wanted to start this vote to
>>>>> gather
>>>>>>>>> support from the community to be stricter wrt committing patches
>>> to
>>>>>> Hive.
>>>>>>>>> The committers guide [2] already specifies that a +1 should be
>>>>> obtained
>>>>>>>>> before committing, but there is another clause that allows
>>> committing
>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>> the presence of flaky tests (clause 4). Flaky tests are as good
>> as
>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>> no tests, hence I propose to remove clause 4 and enforce the +1
>>> from
>>>>>>>>> testing infra before committing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As I see it, by enforcing that we always get a +1 from the
>> testing
>>>>>> infra
>>>>>>>>> before committing, 1) we will have a more stable project, and 2)
>>> we
>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> have another incentive as a community to create a more robust
>>> testing
>>>>>>>>> infra, e.g., replacing flaky tests for similar unit tests that
>> are
>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> flaky, trying to decrease running time for tests, etc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please, share your thoughts about this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is my +1.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jes?s
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hive-dev/201805.
>>>>>>>>> mbox/%3C63023673-AEE5-41A9-BA52-5A5DFB2078B6%40apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/
>>>>>>>>> HowToCommit#HowToCommit-PreCommitruns,andcommittingpatches
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards!
>>>>>>>> Rui Li
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sahil Takiar
>>>> Software Engineer
>>>> [email protected] | (510) 673-0309
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
