+1 Thanx Stamatis, makes sense
-Ayush > On 12-May-2023, at 10:14 PM, Attila Turoczy <aturo...@cloudera.com.invalid> > wrote: > > +1 > >> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 4:01 PM Alessandro Solimando < >> alessandro.solima...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Stamatis, >> I am experiencing the same too, so +1 from me. >> Best regards, >> Alessandro >> On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 15:58, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Everything that happens in a GitHub PR creates a worklog entry under >>> the respective JIRA ticket. >>> For every worklog entry we receive a notification from j...@apache.org >>> when we are watching an issue. The worklog entry and email >>> notification usually appear messy. >>> Moreover, if we are watching the GitHub PR we are going to get a >>> notification from notificati...@github.com which has the same content >>> with the JIRA worklog entry and is much more readable. >>> Finally, the PR notification is also going to >>> iss...@hive.apache.org and git...@hive.apache.org so those who are >>> subscribed to these lists >>> will get the same notification multiple times. >>> Personally, I never read the JIRA worklog notifications and I largely >>> prefer those from notificati...@github.com. >>> How do you feel about disabling the worklog entries in JIRA coming >>> from GitHub PRs? >>> For archiving purposes, the notifications already go to gitbox@ so we >>> don't lose anything from disabling the worklog entries. On the >>> contrary, I find that this would reduce the noise and redundancy in >>> our inboxes. >>> Concretely this is what I have in mind in terms of change: >>> https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/4318 >>> Best, >>> Stamatis
