+1 Kill it! :)
mockito is a more modern approach. I think it is cool that we modernize our
platform, and remove old and unsupported tools and components.


On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 5:36 PM Ayush Saxena <ayush...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1, PowerMock as far as I remember has issues with JDK-11+ as well,
> one such ref :
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52966897/powermock-java-11
>
> -Ayush
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 20:18, Zsolt Miskolczi <zsolt.miskol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Hive heavily uses PowerMock <https://powermock.github.io/>. The main
> > purpose of it is having static mocking.
> >
> > The sad thing is it seems PowerMock is dead:
> > - The main branch got it's lot commit in 2022 and and most of the
> > contributions last year were simple dependency upgrades:
> > https://github.com/powermock/powermock/commits/release/2.x
> > - The last release was in 2020
> > - And their mailing list looks dead as well. That is the last email on
> that
> > list: https://groups.google.com/g/powermock/c/JdYY3naZlbU. It asked if
> it
> > was discontinued and didn't get an answer at all.
> >
> > So officially, it is not dead but it seems it is.
> >
> > Back then when PowerMock development started, there were no static
> mocking
> > in mockito. But since then, it is possible using mockito-inline.
> >
> > I won't lie, it is hard to switch from PowerMock: it enables some coding
> > patterns that are considered bad patterns and it leads to code that is
> > harder to test. Last year I played with it and removed it from the
> > hive-exec module: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/3798.
> >
> > The hard part in removing it is that PowerMock and mockito-inline don't
> > work together. So when we want to remove it, we have to do it in one pull
> > request for a given module. It cannot be separated into smaller steps.
> > The good news is as it relates to testing, pre commit tests can validate
> > the refactor.
> >
> > What do you think? Should we move away from PowerMock or keep it as it
> is?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Zsolt Miskolczi
>

Reply via email to