I was confused about the subject line since it says 3.x as well along with 1.x and 2.x. Does this discussion include all 1.x, 2.x and 3.x or just 1.x and 2.x?
I think it makes sense to EOL 1.x. Looks like 2.x is still being maintained by Chao and I think we were backporting PRs to the 3.x line pretty recently so I believe we should wait out for a release on Hive 3.x. Thanks, Vihang On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:40 PM Attila Turoczy <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear PMC's, > > Do we have a verdict / decision about this? > > -Attila > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 5:45 PM Chao Sun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Hive 2.x, I'm still preparing for another release 2.3.10 (Hive 2.3 > > branch is being actively maintained so far). Hopefully this will be > > the last release in the branch-2 line. > > > > +1 on making Hive 1 EOL for the time being. > > > > Chao > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 8:10 AM Sankar Hariappan > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 for making both Hive 1&2 EOL > > > > > > -Sankar > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Attila Turoczy <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 7:37 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] End of life for Hive 1.x, 2.x, 3.x > > > > > > [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn > > why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > > > > > +1 for making it EOL for Hive 1 and Hive 2. I do not think these 2 > > product > > > branches are relevant in 2023. > > > > > > -Attila > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:59 PM Denys Kuzmenko <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for marking Hive 1.x EOL > > > > > > > > Assuming no volunteers willing to take ownership of branch-2 > > maintenance, > > > > +1 to declare it EOL as well. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Denys > > > > > > >
