[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13452481#comment-13452481
 ] 

Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-3098:
--------------------------------------------

Gentlemen, would it be agreeable to get this fix into branch-0.9/? That would 
really help us.
                
> Memory leak from large number of FileSystem instances in FileSystem.CACHE
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-3098
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3098
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Shims
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>         Environment: Running with Hadoop 20.205.0.3+ / 1.0.x with security 
> turned on.
>            Reporter: Mithun Radhakrishnan
>            Assignee: Mithun Radhakrishnan
>             Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>         Attachments: Hive-3098_(FS_closeAllForUGI()).patch, hive-3098.patch, 
> Hive_3098.patch
>
>
> The problem manifested from stress-testing HCatalog 0.4.1 (as part of testing 
> the Oracle backend).
> The HCatalog server ran out of memory (-Xmx2048m) when pounded by 60-threads, 
> in under 24 hours. The heap-dump indicates that hadoop::FileSystem.CACHE had 
> 1000000 instances of FileSystem, whose combined retained-mem consumed the 
> entire heap.
> It boiled down to hadoop::UserGroupInformation::equals() being implemented 
> such that the "Subject" member is compared for equality ("=="), and not 
> equivalence (".equals()"). This causes equivalent UGI instances to compare as 
> unequal, and causes a new FileSystem instance to be created and cached.
> The UGI.equals() is so implemented, incidentally, as a fix for yet another 
> problem (HADOOP-6670); so it is unlikely that that implementation can be 
> modified.
> The solution for this is to check for UGI equivalence in HCatalog (i.e. in 
> the Hive metastore), using an cache for UGI instances in the shims.
> I have a patch to fix this. I'll upload it shortly. I just ran an overnight 
> test to confirm that the memory-leak has been arrested.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to