[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13487061#comment-13487061
]
Vighnesh Avadhani commented on HIVE-3640:
-----------------------------------------
Done: https://reviews.facebook.net/D6327
I could not use arc diff --jira HIVE-3640 as it was throwing:
PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined method ArcanistGitAPI::amendGitHeadCommit()
in /Users/vighnesh/hive/.arc_jira_lib/arcanist/ArcJIRAConfiguration.php on line
173
> Reducer allocation is incorrect if enforce bucketing and mapred.reduce.tasks
> are both set
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-3640
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3640
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Vighnesh Avadhani
> Assignee: Vighnesh Avadhani
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HIVE-3640.1.patch.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> When I enforce bucketing and fix the number of reducers via
> mapred.reduce.tasks Hive ignores my input and instead takes the largest value
> <= hive.exec.reducers.max that is also an even divisor of num_buckets. In
> other words, if I set 1024 buckets and set mapred.reduce.tasks=1024 I'll get.
> . . 256 reducers. If I set 1997 buckets and set mapred.reduce.tasks=1997 I'll
> get. . . 1 reducer.
> This is totally crazy, and it's far, far crazier when the data inputs get
> large. In the latter case the bucketing job will almost certainly fail
> because we'll most likely try to stuff several TB of input through a single
> reducer. We'll also drastically reduce the effectiveness of bucketing, since
> the buckets themselves will be larger.
> If the user sets mapred.reduce.tasks in a query that inserts into a bucketed
> table we should either accept that value or raise an exception if it's
> invalid relative to the number of buckets. We should absolutely NOT override
> the user's direction and fall back on automatically allocating reducers based
> on some obscure logic dictated by completely different setting.
> I have yet to encounter a single person who expected this the first time, so
> it's clearly a bug.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
