----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12750/#review23553 -----------------------------------------------------------
ivy/libraries.properties <https://reviews.apache.org/r/12750/#comment47453> is connection pool removed intentionally? HIVE-4807 changed pooling enabled by default to solve some problem, I had trouble starting metastore with that setting without this jar. Could just be me but worth checking metastore/src/model/package.jdo <https://reviews.apache.org/r/12750/#comment47454> this (and other stuff above and below) will require schema upgrade script as far as I see - Sergey Shelukhin On July 18, 2013, 11:27 p.m., Xuefu Zhang wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12750/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 18, 2013, 11:27 p.m.) > > > Review request for hive and Ashutosh Chauhan. > > > Bugs: HIVE-3632 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3632 > > > Repository: hive-git > > > Description > ------- > > 1. Upgrade DataNucleus to 3.2 stable version. > 2. Fix a few issues that arose. > > While the fix is motivated for JDK7 support, the patch is completely > applicable for running with JDK6. > > > Diffs > ----- > > common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/conf/HiveConf.java 11c3121 > conf/hive-default.xml.template 603b475 > ivy/libraries.properties 0e1b992 > metastore/build.xml 0e94611 > metastore/ivy.xml 356e19d > metastore/src/model/package.jdo a84d2bf > ql/ivy.xml bfb3116 > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/DDLTask.java 9883659 > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/Utilities.java cbda70b > > ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/alter_rename_partition_authorization.q.out > 4262b7c > ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/authorization_2.q.out c934a2a > ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/authorization_6.q.out b8483ca > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12750/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > 1. Ran all unit tests with 0.10.0 as the base, and all pased. > 2. Ran all unit tests with trunk, and there was a test failure but seemingly > unrelated. Conducting further testing. (Second run was successful!) > 3. Ran some basic end2end tests. Issues are fixed as they arise. The effort > will continue. > > > Thanks, > > Xuefu Zhang > >
