[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13808846#comment-13808846
]
Navis commented on HIVE-3562:
-----------------------------
[~sershe] Sorry for late reply. I thought the cost of top-n hash(array copy,
memory usage, etc.) would be bigger than possible gain of unknown future.
Better policy might be implemented in following issue by someone with good idea.
> Some limit can be pushed down to map stage
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-3562
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-3562
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Navis
> Assignee: Navis
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 0.12.0
>
> Attachments: HIVE-3562.D5967.1.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.2.patch,
> HIVE-3562.D5967.3.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.4.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.5.patch,
> HIVE-3562.D5967.6.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.7.patch, HIVE-3562.D5967.8.patch,
> HIVE-3562.D5967.9.patch
>
>
> Queries with limit clause (with reasonable number), for example
> {noformat}
> select * from src order by key limit 10;
> {noformat}
> makes operator tree,
> TS-SEL-RS-EXT-LIMIT-FS
> But LIMIT can be partially calculated in RS, reducing size of shuffling.
> TS-SEL-RS(TOP-N)-EXT-LIMIT-FS
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
