[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13828528#comment-13828528
 ] 

Amareshwari Sriramadasu commented on HIVE-4956:
-----------------------------------------------

I agree with the concerns above that this is deviating from SQL. But it gives 
lot of performance improvement in distributed systems. How about change the 
separator to '+' instead of ',', as part of Hive QL? 

The query will look like the following :
{noformat}
select t.x, t.y, .... from T1+T2 t where t.p1='x' OR t.p1='y' ... 
[groupby-clause] [having-clause] [orderby-clause]
{noformat}

If the proposal is fine, I can upload the patch.

> Allow multiple tables in from clause if all them have the same schema, but 
> can be partitioned differently
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-4956
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4956
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Query Processor
>            Reporter: Amareshwari Sriramadasu
>            Assignee: Amareshwari Sriramadasu
>
> We have a usecase where the table storage partitioning changes over time.
> For ex:
>  we can have a table T1 which is partitioned by p1. But overtime, we want to 
> partition the table on p1 and p2 as well. The new table can be T2. So, if we 
> have to query table on partition p1, it will be a union query across two 
> table T1 and T2. Especially with aggregations like avg, it becomes costly 
> union query because we cannot make use of mapside aggregations and other 
> optimizations.
> The proposal is to support queries of the following format :
> select t.x, t.y, .... from T1,T2 t where t.p1='x' OR t.p1='y' ... 
> [groupby-clause] [having-clause] [orderby-clause] and so on.
> Here we allow from clause as a comma separated list of tables with an alias 
> and alias will be used in the full query, and partition pruning will happen 
> on the actual tables to pick up the right paths. This will work because the 
> difference is only on picking up the input paths and whole operator tree does 
> not change. If this sounds a good usecase, I can put up the changes required 
> to support the same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to